Nx OsOperating system · Cisco

CVE-2019-1809

MEDIUM · 6.7 CVSS v3.1 Published 2019-05-15
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 3.2 / 7.3 or later.
See remediation →
69/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
A vulnerability in the Image Signature Verification feature of Cisco NX-OS Software could allow an authenticated, local attacker with administrator-level credentials to install a malicious software patch on an affected device. The vulnerability is due to improper verification of digital signatures for patch images. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by crafting an unsigned software patch to bypass signature checks and loading it on an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to boot a malicious software patch image.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

A local privilege escalation vulnerability in Cisco NX-OS Image Signature Verification allows an authenticated administrator to bypass digital signature checks when installing software patches. An attacker can craft a malicious unsigned patch that bypasses signature validation, enabling boot of a compromised software image.

MitigationApply the Cisco patch for this vulnerability; restrict administrator-level access and monitor for unauthorized patch installations until the vendor update is applied.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Nx OsOperating system
Affected:>= 7.3, < 8.1\(1a\)>= 8.2, < 8.3\(1\)>= 7.2, < 7.3\(3\)d1\(1\)>= 8.0, < 8.2\(3\)>= 3.1, < 3.2\(3k\)

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Local
Complexity
Low
Privileges
High
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify installed NX-OS version
    Run 'show version' or access the system ROM monitor to retrieve the currently running NX-OS software version
    Affected if The installed version falls within any of the following ranges: >= 7.3 and < 8.1(1a); >= 8.2 and < 8.3(1); >= 7.2 and < 7.3(3)d1(1); >= 8.0 and < 8.2(3); >= 3.1 and < 3.2(3k)
  2. Verify image signature verification feature status
    Check the NX-OS configuration for image signature verification settings using 'show running-config | include signature' or similar configuration review commands
    Affected if Image signature verification is configured and the NX-OS version is vulnerable as identified in step 1
  3. Review recent patch installation logs
    Examine system logs, install logs, or audit records for any software patch installations that may have occurred recently using 'show install log' or review syslog exports
    Affected if Any patch installations are present in the logs and the system is running a vulnerable NX-OS version
  4. Audit administrator account activity
    Review authentication logs and administrator command history for any unusual or unauthorized patch installation commands
    Affected if Evidence of patch installation commands exists and the NX-OS version is within the affected ranges

A system is likely affected if it runs any Cisco NX-OS version matching the affected ranges and has image signature verification enabled, as the vulnerability allows bypassing this security control.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to 3.2 / 7.3 / 8.1 or later
Fixed in 3.27.38.1
Interim mitigation

Apply the Cisco patch for this vulnerability; restrict administrator-level access and monitor for unauthorized patch installations until the vendor update is applied.

Fix this in Nx Os Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation3.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
8.0 hours of engineering $1,420
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,272.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2019-1809 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2019-1809 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data