CVE-2019-1895
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability in the Virtual Network Computing (VNC) console implementation of Cisco Enterprise NFV Infrastructure Software (NFVIS) could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to access the VNC console session of an administrative user on an affected device. The vulnerability is due to an insufficient authentication mechanism used to establish a VNC session. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by intercepting an administrator VNC session request prior to login. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to watch the administrator console session or interact with it, allowing admin access to the affected device.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA vulnerability in Cisco NFVIS VNC console allows unauthenticated remote attackers to intercept or hijack administrator VNC sessions due to insufficient authentication during session establishment. An attacker can watch or interact with the admin console, gaining full admin access to the affected NFV Infrastructure Software device.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 3.12.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify if Cisco NFVIS is installedCheck system for NFVIS installation or running processes. Look for NFVIS-specific processes, directories, or the presence of NFVIS administrative interfaces.Affected if NFVIS software is not present on the system
-
Determine the installed NFVIS versionAccess the NFVIS CLI or administrative interface and run the command to display the version, such as 'show version' or 'show system information'. Compare the displayed version against the affected range of versions prior to 3.12.1.Affected if The installed version is lower than 3.12.1
-
Verify if VNC feature is enabledCheck the NFVIS configuration for VNC server settings. Look for VNC-related configuration commands or the presence of VNC server processes listening on ports 5900 and above.Affected if VNC functionality is enabled and the system is listening on VNC ports
-
Check network exposure of VNC portsScan the network interface or review firewall rules to determine if VNC ports (typically 5900+) are exposed to untrusted networks. Use 'netstat' or 'ss' to list listening ports, and review any accessible VNC endpoints.Affected if VNC ports are accessible from untrusted network segments
A system is affected if it runs Cisco NFVIS with a version below 3.12.1, has the VNC feature enabled, and has VNC ports (5900+) exposed to network attackers.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped3.12.1
Apply the Cisco patch for CVE-2019-1895 when available. As a compensating control, restrict network access to VNC ports (typically 5900+) via firewall rules or ACLs, and consider disabling VNC if not operationally critical until the patch is applied.
Cisco Enterprise NFV Infrastructure Software 3.12.1 or later
- Backup the current NFVIS configuration and export any critical data
- Access the NFVIS admin console or CLI
- Navigate to the software upgrade section
- Obtain Cisco NFVIS version 3.12.1 or later from Cisco (via tools.cisco.com or official Cisco support channels)
- Upload the upgrade image to the NFVIS device
- Initiate the upgrade process and monitor for completion
- After reboot, verify the running version is 3.12.1 or later using 'show version' command
- Verify the VNC console now properly requires authentication before session establishment
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2019-1895 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2019-1895 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data