CVE-2019-1971
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability in the web portal of Cisco Enterprise NFV Infrastructure Software (NFVIS) could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to perform a command injection attack and execute arbitrary commands with root privileges. The vulnerability is due to insufficient input validation by the web portal framework. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by providing malicious input during web portal authentication. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary commands with root privileges on the underlying operating system.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA command injection vulnerability in the Cisco Enterprise NFV Infrastructure Software (NFVIS) web portal allows unauthenticated remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands with root privileges due to insufficient input validation during web portal authentication.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 3.6.2, <= 3.8.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify NFVIS versionAccess the NFVIS CLI or web portal and locate the software version information. On the CLI, this is typically shown in the startup banner or can be retrieved via 'show version' or 'show system information' commands.Affected if The installed version falls within the range >= 3.6.2 and <= 3.8.1
-
Confirm web portal is enabledCheck the NFVIS configuration to determine if the web portal (HTTP/HTTPS) service is active. This can be done via 'show webui status' or by reviewing the interface bindings in the configuration.Affected if The web portal interface is listening and accessible (HTTP or HTTPS services are enabled)
-
Verify management interface accessibilityDetermine if the NFVIS management interface (where the web portal runs) is exposed to the network. Check interface bindings and network accessibility using 'show interface' or reviewing the running configuration for external-facing IP assignments.Affected if The management interface with the web portal is reachable from untrusted networks (not restricted to localhost or isolated management VLAN)
A system is affected if it is running NFVIS versions 3.6.2 through 3.8.1 with the web portal enabled and accessible, allowing unauthenticated attackers to inject commands through the authentication mechanism.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply Cisco's security patch for CVE-2019-1971 to upgrade to a fixed version. Until patched, restrict network access to the management interface and disable the web portal if possible.
NFVIS 3.9.1 or later
- 1. Identify the current NFVIS version by running 'show version' or accessing the admin console
- 2. If version is between 3.6.2 and 3.8.1 (inclusive), plan for upgrade
- 3. Backup current configuration using 'archive config' or export via web portal
- 4. Download the fixed NFVIS release (3.9.1 or later) from Cisco (requires valid service contract)
- 5. Upload the new image via web portal or CLI: 'system image <image-file>'
- 6. Reboot the system to apply the new image: 'reload'
- 7. Verify the upgrade was successful and the new version is running: 'show version'
- 8. Confirm vulnerability is remediated by checking Cisco advisory for the fixed release
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,408.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2019-1971 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2019-1971 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data