CVE-2019-1965
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability in the Virtual Shell (VSH) session management for Cisco NX-OS Software could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to cause a VSH process to fail to delete upon termination. This can lead to a build-up of VSH processes that overtime can deplete system memory. When there is no system memory available, this can cause unexpected system behaviors and crashes. The vulnerability is due to the VSH process not being properly deleted when a remote management connection to the device is disconnected. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by repeatedly performing a remote management connection to the device and terminating the connection in an unexpected manner. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to cause the VSH processes to fail to delete, which can lead to a system-wide denial of service (DoS) condition. The attacker must have valid user credentials to log in to the device using the remote management connection.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceIn Cisco NX-OS Software, the Virtual Shell (VSH) process fails to properly clean up when remote management connections (such as SSH) are terminated abruptly. Repeatedly connecting and abnormally disconnecting causes VSH processes to accumulate in memory without being deleted. Over time, this memory leak depletes available system memory, leading to system instability, unexpected behavior, and ultimately a denial of service condition.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 5.2, < 6.2\(29\)>= 7.3, < 8.4>= 7.0\(3\)f, < 9.2< 7.1\(5\)n1\(1b\)>= 7.3, < 7.3\(5\)n1\(1\)< 6.2\(22\)>= 7.2, < 7.3\(4\)d1\(1\)>= 8.0, < 8.2\(3\)>= 8.3, < 8.4< 7.0\(3\)i4\(9\)>= 7.0\(3\)i7, < 7.0\(3\)i7\(4\)>= 7.0\(3\)i7, < 7.0\(3\)i7\(6\)CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Determine NX-OS software versionExecute 'show version' on the device CLI and locate the 'NX-OS' or 'system' version line (often labeled as 'Cisco Nexus Operating System' or 'NX-OS')Affected if The installed version falls within any of the affected ranges: >= 5.2 and < 6.2(29); >= 7.3 and < 8.4; >= 7.0(3)f and < 9.2; < 7.1(5)n1(1b); >= 7.3 and < 7.3(5)n1(1); < 6.2(22); >= 7.2 and < 7.3(4)d1(1); >= 8.0 and < 8.2(3); >= 8.3 and < 8.4; < 7.0(3)i4(9); >= 7.0(3)i7 and < 7.0(3)i7(4); >= 7.0(3)i7
-
Verify SSH remote management is enabledExecute 'show ssh' or 'show running-config | include ssh' to check if SSH server is configured for remote management accessAffected if SSH is enabled, as the vulnerability is triggered through SSH (or similar remote management) connections being abruptly terminated
-
Check for accumulated VSH processesExecute 'show process' or 'show system internal processes vsh' to list active VSH shell processes. Compare the count of VSH processes against the number of active SSH sessions using 'show ssh' or 'show sessions'Affected if The number of VSH processes in the process list significantly exceeds the number of active SSH management sessions, indicating leaked processes from prior terminated connections
-
Monitor system memory utilizationExecute 'show system resources' or 'show memory' to review available system memoryAffected if Memory utilization is abnormally high or steadily increasing without corresponding legitimate workload, which may indicate the VSH memory leak is active
The device is affected if it runs a vulnerable NX-OS version from the listed ranges AND has SSH remote management enabled, with observable accumulation of VSH processes or depleted system memory.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor data6.27.07.1
Apply the Cisco-provided software patch for CVE-2019-1965; until then, limit exposure by restricting remote management access to trusted management networks and monitor for unusual VSH process accumulation.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,392.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2019-1965 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2019-1965 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data