CVE-2019-1977
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability within the Endpoint Learning feature of Cisco Nexus 9000 Series Switches running in Application Centric Infrastructure (ACI) mode could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to cause a denial of service (DoS) condition on an endpoint device in certain circumstances. The vulnerability is due to improper endpoint learning when packets are received on a specific port from outside the ACI fabric and destined to an endpoint located on a border leaf when Disable Remote Endpoint Learning has been enabled. This can result in a Remote (XR) entry being created for the impacted endpoint that will become stale if the endpoint migrates to a different port or leaf switch. This results in traffic not reaching the impacted endpoint until the Remote entry can be relearned by another mechanism.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA vulnerability in Cisco Nexus 9000 Series Switches running in ACI mode allows unauthenticated remote attackers to cause DoS via the Endpoint Learning feature. When Disable Remote Endpoint Learning is enabled, packets from outside the ACI fabric destined to an endpoint on a border leaf create a stale Remote (XR) entry that prevents traffic from reaching the endpoint if the endpoint migrates to a different port or leaf switch.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 12.3\(1h\)= 13.1\(2m\)= 13.1\(2o\)= 13.1\(2p\)CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the device model and modeRun 'show version' or 'show inventory' to confirm the device is a Cisco Nexus 9000 Series Switch. Run 'show fabric mode' or 'show acitopology' to confirm it is running in ACI mode.Affected if Device is a Nexus 9000 Series Switch NOT running in ACI mode, then this CVE does not apply.
-
Check the NX-OS versionRun 'show version' and locate the installed NX-OS version. Compare it against the affected versions: 12.3(1h), 13.1(2m), 13.1(2o), 13.1(2p).Affected if Installed version matches exactly one of the affected versions listed.
-
Verify if Disable Remote Endpoint Learning is configuredRun 'show running-config | include endpoint learning' or 'show endpoint interface' to check the Endpoint Learning configuration. Look for the 'Disable Remote Endpoint Learning' setting on border leaf switches.Affected if Disable Remote Endpoint Learning is enabled on the border leaf switch.
-
Inspect for stale Remote (XR) entriesRun 'show endpoint' or 'show endpoint remote' to view Remote (XR) entries. Look for entries associated with external interfaces that may be stale after endpoint migration.Affected if Stale Remote (XR) entries exist showing endpoints that have migrated to different ports or leaf switches.
You are affected if you have a Nexus 9000 switch in ACI mode running one of the exact affected versions (12.3(1h), 13.1(2m), 13.1(2o), or 13.1(2p) with Disable Remote Endpoint Learning enabled on a border leaf.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataReview the Disable Remote Endpoint Learning configuration on affected border leaf switches and consider disabling this feature if appropriate, or apply Cisco's recommended updates if available.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation1.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,696.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2019-1977 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2019-1977 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data