CVE-2019-5537
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedSensitive information disclosure vulnerability resulting from a lack of certificate validation during the File-Based Backup and Restore operations of VMware vCenter Server Appliance (6.7 before 6.7u3a and 6.5 before 6.5u3d) may allow a malicious actor to intercept sensitive data in transit over FTPS and HTTPS. A malicious actor with man-in-the-middle positioning between vCenter Server Appliance and a backup target may be able to intercept sensitive data in transit during File-Based Backup and Restore operations.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA lack of certificate validation in VMware vCenter Server Appliance's File-Based Backup and Restore operations (versions 6.7 before 6.7u3a and 6.5 before 6.5u3d) allows man-in-the-middle attackers to intercept sensitive data transmitted over FTPS and HTTPS during backup and restore processes.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 6.5= 6.7CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify vCenter Server Appliance versionLog into the vCenter Server Appliance management interface (https://appliance_ip:5480) and navigate to Summary, or run 'vpxd -v' via SSH to retrieve the exact version build number.Affected if The installed version is 6.5 (any build before 6.5u3d) or 6.7 (any build before 6.7u3a). Compare your build number to the fixed releases.
-
Verify File-Based Backup is configuredAccess the vCenter Server Appliance management portal, go to Backup > Backup Scheduler, or check the /opt/vmware/appliance/backups/ configuration directory. Determine if any backup schedules exist using the File-Based Backup functionality.Affected if File-Based Backup schedules are configured and active, exposing the system to the vulnerability during backup/restore operations.
-
Check backup transfer protocol settingsIn the Backup > Backup Scheduler configuration, examine the protocol setting for configured backup jobs. Look for FTPS or HTTPS transfer method selections in the backup destination configuration.Affected if The backup destination uses FTPS or HTTPS as the transfer protocol, which are the affected protocols for this certificate validation flaw.
-
Inspect backup destination configurationReview the backup job destination URL or hostname configuration in the vCenter Server Appliance backup settings. Determine if the backup target is an external FTP/FTPS server or uses HTTPS-based backup transfer.Affected if The backup target is configured to use FTPS or HTTPS protocols, which lack proper certificate validation in the affected versions.
A user is affected if the vCenter Server Appliance runs version 6.5 before build 6.5u3d or 6.7 before build 6.7u3a AND File-Based Backup/Restore is configured to use FTPS or HTTPS protocols.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade vCenter Server Appliance to version 6.7u3a or 6.5u3d or later to implement proper certificate validation, or ensure backup target communications use trusted certificates and network segmentation to reduce MITM exposure.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,656.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2019-5537 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2019-5537 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data