CVE-2019-6558
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIn Auto-Maskin RP210E Versions 3.7 and prior, DCU210E Versions 3.7 and prior and Marine Observer Pro (Android App), the software contains a mechanism for users to recover or change their passwords without knowing the original password, but the mechanism is weak.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceAuto-Maskin RP210E, DCU210E, and Marine Observer Pro contain a weak password recovery mechanism that allows users to reset or change passwords without knowing the original password, enabling unauthorized account access.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 3.7<= 3.7all versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the product modelDetermine if the device is an Auto-Maskin RP210E, DCU210E, or Marine Pro Observer by checking the device label, documentation, or system information screenAffected if The device is any of these three models
-
Check firmware version on RP210E or DCU210EAccess the device firmware/version information through the device interface, admin panel, or system settings menu, then compare the version number to 3.7Affected if Firmware version is 3.7 or lower on RP210E or DCU210E
-
Check Marine Pro Observer versionLocate the Marine Pro Observer version information in the device settings, about screen, or product documentationAffected if Any version of Marine Pro Observer is in use (all versions affected)
-
Verify password recovery authenticationAttempt to access or document the password reset/recovery workflow - check if the system requires the original password, security questions, or secondary verification before allowing a password changeAffected if The password reset function allows changes without requiring the original password or secondary verification
You are affected if you use an Auto-Maskin RP210E or DCU210E with firmware 3.7 or lower, or any version of Marine Pro Observer, and the password recovery mechanism does not require the original password or additional verification.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement strong authentication for password recovery, such as requiring original password, email/SMS verification, security questions, or multi-factor authentication before allowing password changes.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,800.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2019-6558 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2019-6558 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data