Factorytalk Services PlatformApplication · Rockwellautomation

CVE-2020-12033

HIGH · 8.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2020-06-23
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
93/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
In Rockwell Automation FactoryTalk Services Platform, all versions, the redundancy host service (RdcyHost.exe) does not validate supplied identifiers, which could allow an unauthenticated, adjacent attacker to execute remote COM objects with elevated privileges.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

The redundancy host service (RdcyHost.exe) in Rockwell Automation FactoryTalk Services Platform lacks proper validation of supplied identifiers, allowing an unauthenticated adjacent network attacker to execute remote COM objects with elevated privileges. This is a code-level vulnerability in a critical industrial automation redundancy service.

MitigationApply vendor patches when available, implement network segmentation to restrict adjacent network access to the service, and verify the redundancy host service runs with minimal required privileges.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Factorytalk Services PlatformApplication
Affected:all versions

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Adjacent
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Verify FactoryTalk Services Platform installation
    Check Windows Programs and Features for 'Rockwell Automation FactoryTalk Services Platform' or search for FactoryTalk installation directories (typically under C:\Program Files\Rockwell Software\ or C:\Program Files (x86)\Rockwell Software\)
    Affected if FactoryTalk Services Platform is installed on the system
  2. Identify redundancy host service
    Open Windows Services console (services.msc) and look for a service named 'FactoryTalk Redundancy' or similar, or check Task Manager for running process RdcyHost.exe
    Affected if The RdcyHost.exe process is running as a service on the system
  3. Confirm service is running with elevated privileges
    Right-click the identified service in Services console, select Properties, and check the 'Log On' account. Also right-click the process in Task Manager, go to Properties, and examine the user account listed under the Security section
    Affected if The service runs under a privileged account (such as LocalSystem, a domain admin, or other elevated Windows account)
  4. Assess network exposure
    Open Windows Firewall with Advanced Security, review inbound rules for ports associated with FactoryTalk Services (check for rules containing 'FactoryTalk', 'Redundancy', or 'RdcyHost'), or use netstat -ano to list listening ports and correlate with FactoryTalk services
    Affected if The service has open inbound ports accessible from adjacent network segments (non-localhost listeners)

If FactoryTalk Services Platform is installed with the RdcyHost.exe redundancy service running under elevated privileges and exposed to adjacent network segments, the system is vulnerable to CVE-2020-12033.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply vendor patches when available, implement network segmentation to restrict adjacent network access to the service, and verify the redundancy host service runs with minimal required privileges.

Fix this in Factorytalk Services Platform Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation8.0 h
  • Implementation16.0 h
  • Testing12.0 h
  • Review / QA8.0 h
44.0 hours of engineering $7,720
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $12,352.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2020-12033 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2020-12033 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data