Hcl Client Application AccessApplication · Hcltechsw

CVE-2020-14231

HIGH · 8.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2020-12-22
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
94/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
A vulnerability in the input parameter handling of HCL Client Application Access v9 could potentially be exploited by an authenticated attacker resulting in a stack buffer overflow. This could allow the attacker to crash the program or inject code into the system which would execute with the privileges of the currently logged in user.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

A stack buffer overflow vulnerability exists in HCL Client Application Access v9's input parameter handling. An authenticated attacker can exploit this to crash the application or execute arbitrary code with the privileges of the currently logged-in user.

MitigationApply vendor-supplied patches/updates for HCL Client Application Access v9 when available; until then, limit access to trusted authenticated users and monitor for exploitation attempts.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Hcl Client Application AccessApplication
Affected:= 9.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify if HCL Client Application Access is installed
    Check installed programs or application inventory for 'HCL Client Application Access' or 'Hcl Client Application Access'
    Affected if The application is present on the system
  2. Determine the installed version of HCL Client Application Access
    Use system inventory tools, check program properties, or query the application's about/version information to confirm the exact version number
    Affected if The installed version is exactly 9.0 (version 9.0)
  3. Verify if remote or local access is available to untrusted users
    Review application access controls, user permissions, and authentication settings to determine if unauthenticated or untrusted users can reach the application
    Affected if Untrusted or unauthenticated users can access the application (note: CVE states authenticated attacker required, but assess whether your user base includes untrusted accounts)
  4. Monitor for application crashes or unusual behavior
    Review application logs, Windows event logs, or crash dump files for unexpected terminations or errors related to Client Application Access
    Affected if The application crashes repeatedly or exhibits unexpected behavior during normal use
  5. Check for suspicious processes or unauthorized code execution
    Use task manager or process monitoring tools to observe running processes under the logged-in user's context, looking for unexpected child processes spawned by the application
    Affected if Unexpected processes are running under the user's privileges that were not initiated by the user

You are affected if HCL Client Application Access version 9.0 is installed and accessible to users who could exploit the input parameter handling flaw.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply vendor-supplied patches/updates for HCL Client Application Access v9 when available; until then, limit access to trusted authenticated users and monitor for exploitation attempts.

Fix this in Hcl Client Application Access Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation1.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
7.0 hours of engineering $1,210
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,936.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2020-14231 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2020-14231 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data