OnbaseApplication · Hyland

CVE-2020-25258

CRITICAL · 9.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2020-09-11
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 20.3.10.1000 or later.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
An issue was discovered in Hyland OnBase 16.0.2.83 and below, 17.0.2.109 and below, 18.0.0.37 and below, 19.8.16.1000 and below and 20.3.10.1000 and below. It uses ASP.NET BinaryFormatter.Deserialize in a manner that allows attackers to transmit and execute bytecode in SOAP messages.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Hyland OnBase uses ASP.NET BinaryFormatter.Deserialize to process SOAP messages, which allows remote attackers to send malicious serialized objects that get instantiated during deserialization, leading to remote code execution. BinaryFormatter is a well-known dangerous deserialization method in .NET that can execute arbitrary code embedded in the serialized payload.

MitigationUpgrade to a patched version of OnBase that removes BinaryFormatter.Deserialize usage, or implement input validation and replace BinaryFormatter with safe serialization alternatives (such as System.Text.Json or XmlSerializer).

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
OnbaseApplication
Affected:<= 16.0.2.83>= 17.0.0.0, <= 17.0.2.109>= 18.0.0.0, <= 18.0.0.37>= 19.0.0.0, <= 19.8.16.1000>= 20.0.0.0, <= 20.3.10.1000

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify OnBase version
    Locate the OnBase installation and retrieve the version number from the product itself, typically found in the application properties, about dialog, or installation directory
    Affected if The installed version falls within any of these ranges: <= 16.0.2.83; >= 17.0.0.0 and <= 17.0.2.109; >= 18.0.0.0 and <= 18.0.0.37; >= 19.0.0.0 and <= 19.8.16.1000; >= 20.0.0.0 and <= 20.3.10.1000
  2. Confirm SOAP endpoint is exposed
    Check if OnBase SOAP web services are accessible on the network. Verify the SOAP endpoint URL is reachable and the service is listed as available
    Affected if SOAP endpoints are externally accessible or enabled in the OnBase web configuration without restriction
  3. Inspect web configuration for BinaryFormatter
    Examine the ASP.NET configuration files (web.config) for the SOAP service implementation to see if BinaryFormatter.Deserialize is configured or used in the serialization settings
    Affected if BinaryFormatter is enabled or configured in the OnBase web configuration for processing SOAP messages
  4. Check application logs for BinaryFormatter errors
    Review OnBase application and IIS logs for any BinaryFormatter-related exceptions or warnings that indicate the vulnerable deserialization method is being invoked
    Affected if Logs show BinaryFormatter.Deserialize calls or related deserialization activity on SOAP endpoints

You are affected if your OnBase version is within any of the listed affected ranges AND SOAP services with BinaryFormatter deserialization are enabled and accessible.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 20.3.10.1000
Interim mitigation

Upgrade to a patched version of OnBase that removes BinaryFormatter.Deserialize usage, or implement input validation and replace BinaryFormatter with safe serialization alternatives (such as System.Text.Json or XmlSerializer).

Fix this in Onbase Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation12.0 h
  • Implementation32.0 h
  • Testing20.0 h
  • Review / QA8.0 h
72.0 hours of engineering $12,600
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $20,160.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2020-25258 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2020-25258 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data