CVE-2020-26085
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMultiple vulnerabilities in Cisco Jabber for Windows, Jabber for MacOS, and Jabber for mobile platforms could allow an attacker to execute arbitrary programs on the underlying operating system (OS) with elevated privileges or gain access to sensitive information. For more information about these vulnerabilities, see the Details section of this advisory.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceCisco Jabber contains multiple vulnerabilities allowing attackers to execute arbitrary programs with elevated privileges or access sensitive information on Windows, macOS, and mobile platforms. The vulnerabilities stem from improper input validation and insecure handling of specific protocol messages within the Jabber client, enabling code execution in the context of the authenticated user or privilege escalation.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 12.1.4< 12.8.5< 12.9.4>= 12.5, < 12.5.3>= 12.6, < 12.6.4>= 12.7, < 12.7.3>= 12.8, < 12.8.4>= 12.9, < 12.9.3>= 12.9, < 12.9.4CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Cisco Jabber installation locationOn Windows, check Program Files for 'Cisco Systems' folder containing CiscoJabber.exe; on macOS, check /Applications for Cisco Jabber.app; on mobile, check installed apps listAffected if Cisco Jabber is installed on the system
-
Determine installed Jabber versionOn Windows, right-click the executable, select Properties, then look at Details tab for File Version; on macOS, right-click app, Get Info, look at Version field; or run 'Get-Item' PowerShell command on the Jabber executable pathAffected if The version number falls within any of the affected ranges: < 12.1.4, >= 12.5 < 12.5.3, >= 12.6 < 12.6.4, >= 12.7 < 12.7.3, >= 12.8 < 12.8.5, or >= 12.9 < 12.9.4
-
Verify XMPP client functionality is enabledConfirm the Jabber client is configured with an XMPP (Extensible Messaging and Presence Protocol) account and is actively connecting to an XMPP server for messagingAffected if Jabber is actively running and connected to a server, as the code execution occurs through malicious protocol messages received by the client
User is affected if Cisco Jabber is installed with any version below 12.1.4, 12.5.3, 12.6.4, 12.7.3, 12.8.5, or 12.9.4, and the client is configured to handle XMPP protocol connections.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped12.1.412.5.312.6.4
Apply the vendor-supplied patches from Cisco's security advisory; prioritize patching due to the critical 9.9 CVSS score. If patching is delayed, consider network-based restrictions on XMPP traffic and limiting Jabber's network exposure.
12.9.4 or later (or 12.8.5, 12.5.3, or 12.1.4 depending on version branch)
- 1. Identify the current Cisco Jabber version installed by going to Help > About Cisco Jabber
- 2. Determine which version branch your current installation is on (12.1.x, 12.5.x, 12.8.x, or 12.9.x)
- 3. Download the appropriate fixed version from Cisco's official download site: https://software.cisco.com/
- 4. Close all instances of Cisco Jabber
- 5. Run the installer for the fixed version (minimum 12.9.4, or 12.8.5, or 12.5.3, or 12.1.4 depending on your version branch)
- 6. Follow the installation wizard prompts to complete the upgrade
- 7. Restart Cisco Jabber and verify the version in Help > About
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing16.0 h
- Review / QA6.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $10,944.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2020-26085 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2020-26085 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data