CVE-2020-29016
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability in FortiWeb 6.3.0 through 6.3.5 and version before 6.2.4 may allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to overwrite the content of the stack and potentially execute arbitrary code by sending a crafted request with a large certname.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA stack-based buffer overflow exists in FortiWeb's handling of the 'certname' parameter. When processing a crafted HTTP request containing an oversized certificate name, the vulnerable code copies the user-controlled input into a fixed-size stack buffer without proper bounds checking, allowing an unauthenticated attacker to overwrite stack memory and potentially execute arbitrary code.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 6.2.4>= 6.3.0, <= 6.3.5CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check FortiWeb firmware version via CLIRun the command: `get system status` or `fnsysctl get system status` to retrieve the firmware version.Affected if The version is below 6.2.4, or is 6.3.0 through 6.3.5 inclusive.
-
Check FortiWeb version via web UILog into the FortiWeb web interface and navigate to System > Status to view the firmware version displayed on the dashboard.Affected if The version displayed is below 6.2.4, or falls between 6.3.0 and 6.3.5 inclusive.
-
Verify SSL certificate configuration is in useCheck if the FortiWeb appliance is configured with SSL/TLS certificates for protected web servers. In the web UI, navigate to Server Objects > SSL > Certificates to see if any certificates are defined.Affected if The 'certname' parameter vulnerability applies when SSL certificate configuration exists and the device accepts HTTP requests for certificate name handling.
A FortiWeb device is affected if it is running firmware version 6.2.3 or earlier, or version 6.3.0 through 6.3.5, and has SSL certificate configuration enabled.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped6.2.4
Upgrade FortiWeb to version 6.2.4 or later, or 6.3.6 or later. As a critical CVSS 9.8 vulnerability with remote unauthenticated code execution potential, this should be prioritized for immediate remediation.
FortiWeb 6.2.4 or later (6.2.x branch); FortiWeb 6.3.6 or later (6.3.x branch); or latest stable 6.4.x/7.x
- 1. Identify the current FortiWeb version by running 'get system status' or checking the FortiWeb GUI dashboard.
- 2. If running version < 6.2.4, upgrade to FortiWeb 6.2.4 or later.
- 3. If running version 6.3.0 through 6.3.5, upgrade to FortiWeb 6.3.6 or later, or preferably the latest stable version (6.4.x or 7.x).
- 4. Download the upgrade image from Fortinet Customer Support portal (https://support.fortinet.com/).
- 5. Back up the FortiWeb configuration before upgrading.
- 6. Upload the new firmware via FortiWeb GUI (System > Firmware) or CLI ('execute firmware upgrade').
- 7. After upgrade, verify the new version is installed and confirm the vulnerability is resolved.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,544.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2020-29016 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2020-29016 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data