Nx OsOperating system · Cisco

CVE-2020-3168

HIGH · 7.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2020-02-26
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
84/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
A vulnerability in the Secure Login Enhancements capability of Cisco Nexus 1000V Switch for VMware vSphere could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to cause an affected Nexus 1000V Virtual Supervisor Module (VSM) to become inaccessible to users through the CLI. The vulnerability is due to improper resource allocation during failed CLI login attempts when login parameters that are part of the Secure Login Enhancements capability are configured on an affected device. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by performing a high amount of login attempts against the affected device. A successful exploit could cause the affected device to become inaccessible to other users, resulting in a denial of service (DoS) condition requiring a manual power cycle of the VSM to recover.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

A vulnerability in the Secure Login Enhancements of Cisco Nexus 1000V Virtual Supervisor Module (VSM) allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to cause denial of service by performing excessive failed CLI login attempts. The improper resource allocation during these failed attempts exhausts resources, rendering the VSM inaccessible and requiring manual power cycle to recover.

MitigationApply the Cisco patch when available. If the feature is not required, disable Secure Login Enhancements. Restrict management interface access via ACLs or network segmentation to limit exposure to unauthenticated login attempts.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Nx OsOperating system
Affected:= 5.2\(1\)sv3\(4.1a\)

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify the device and installed NX-OS version
    Run 'show version' or access VSM management interface to confirm device type is Cisco Nexus 1000V Virtual Supervisor Module and record the installed NX-OS version
    Affected if The installed version is 5.2(1)sv3(4.1a)
  2. Verify the exact software version string
    Confirm the full version string matches exactly 5.2(1)sv3(4.1a) as listed in the affected versions
    Affected if The version string is exactly 5.2(1)sv3(4.1a)
  3. Check if Secure Login Enhancements is enabled
    Access VSM CLI and run 'show running-config | include secure-login' or similar command to display the Secure Login Enhancements configuration
    Affected if Secure Login Enhancements feature is enabled in the current configuration
  4. Assess management interface accessibility
    Review network access controls, ACLs, or management VLAN configuration to determine if the VSM management interface (typically mgmt0) is reachable from untrusted networks
    Affected if Management interface is accessible from networks where unauthenticated attackers can reach the device

The environment is affected if running Nexus 1000V VSM with NX-OS version 5.2(1)sv3(4.1a) AND Secure Login Enhancements is enabled AND the management interface is accessible to potential attackers.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply the Cisco patch when available. If the feature is not required, disable Secure Login Enhancements. Restrict management interface access via ACLs or network segmentation to limit exposure to unauthenticated login attempts.

Fix this in Nx Os Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
11.0 hours of engineering $1,980
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,168.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2020-3168 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2020-3168 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data