Secure Firewall Management CenterApplication · Cisco

CVE-2020-3410

HIGH · 8.1 CVSS v3.1 Published 2020-10-21
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
90/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
A vulnerability in the Common Access Card (CAC) authentication feature of Cisco Firepower Management Center (FMC) Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to bypass authentication and access the FMC system. The attacker must have a valid CAC to initiate the access attempt. The vulnerability is due to incorrect session invalidation during CAC authentication. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by performing a CAC-based authentication attempt to an affected system. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to access an affected system with the privileges of a CAC-authenticated user who is currently logged in.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

A vulnerability in Cisco Firepower Management Center's Common Access Card (CAC) authentication allows an unauthenticated remote attacker with a valid CAC to bypass authentication due to incorrect session invalidation logic, potentially gaining the privileges of any currently logged-in CAC user.

MitigationApply the Cisco patch for CVE-2020-3410 when available; until then, consider network segmentation, enhanced monitoring of FMC authentication events, and limiting CAC-authenticated sessions.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Secure Firewall Management CenterApplication
Affected:= 6.6.0= 6.6.0.1

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
High
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Verify Cisco Firepower Management Center version
    Log into the FMC web interface and navigate to Help > About, or run 'show version' via CLI to confirm the installed version
    Affected if Version is exactly 6.6.0 or 6.6.0.1
  2. Confirm CAC authentication is enabled
    In FMC web UI, navigate to System > Users > Authentication or System > Configuration > Security > CAC and verify if Common Access Card authentication method is configured and active
    Affected if CAC authentication method is enabled and in use on the FMC
  3. Check for active CAC-authenticated sessions
    In FMC web UI, go to System > Users > Sessions or use the CLI command 'show user-session' to list currently logged-in users and their authentication method
    Affected if Any users are actively logged in via CAC authentication at the time of inspection
  4. Review authentication logs for session anomalies
    In FMC, navigate to Analysis > Connections > Events or System > Logging > Audit Logs and search for authentication events, particularly looking for sessions that may not have properly terminated
    Affected if Audit logs show unexpected session behavior or sessions that remain active after apparent logout for CAC users

Your FMC is affected only if it runs version 6.6.0 or 6.6.0.1 AND CAC authentication is enabled and in use, allowing an attacker with a valid CAC to potentially hijack existing sessions.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply the Cisco patch for CVE-2020-3410 when available; until then, consider network segmentation, enhanced monitoring of FMC authentication events, and limiting CAC-authenticated sessions.

Fix this in Secure Firewall Management Center Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation8.0 h
  • Implementation12.0 h
  • Testing12.0 h
  • Review / QA6.0 h
38.0 hours of engineering $6,640
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $10,624.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2020-3410 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2020-3410 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data