CVE-2020-6111
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn exploitable denial-of-service vulnerability exists in the IPv4 functionality of Allen-Bradley MicroLogix 1100 Programmable Logic Controller Systems Series B FRN 16.000, Series B FRN 15.002, Series B FRN 15.000, Series B FRN 14.000, Series B FRN 13.000, Series B FRN 12.000, Series B FRN 11.000 and Series B FRN 10.000. A specially crafted packet can cause a major error, resulting in a denial of service. An attacker can send a malicious packet to trigger this vulnerability.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA specially crafted IPv4 packet can cause a major error in Allen-Bradley MicroLogix 1100 PLC Series B devices (versions FRN 10.000-16.000), resulting in denial of service. The vulnerability exists in the IPv4 packet processing functionality, where malformed or malicious packets trigger a fault condition causing the device to become unavailable.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 10.000= 11.000= 12.000= 13.000= 14.000= 15.000= 15.002= 16.000CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm device model is MicroLogix 1100 Series BLocate the physical device label or check device documentation. The device model number and series (B) must be explicitly identified. In RSLogix 500 or Connected Components Workbench, verify the device type in the controller properties.Affected if The device is NOT a MicroLogix 1100 Series B model
-
Check installed firmware versionIn RSLogix 500, go to Controller Properties > Processor Name/Properties to view the firmware revision. Alternatively, access the device web server (if enabled) or use RSLinx Classic to view the device firmware version. Compare against affected versions: 10.000, 11.000, 12.000, 13.000, 14.000, 15.000, 15.002, 16.000.Affected if The firmware version falls within the range 10.000 to 16.000 (including 15.002)
-
Verify IPv4 communication is enabledIn RSLogix 500, check the channel configuration for Channel 0 (Ethernet). Confirm that Ethernet/IP communication is enabled. Also verify the device has an IP address assigned and is actively communicating on the network.Affected if IPv4 Ethernet communication is enabled and the device has an IP address
-
Assess network exposure to untrusted IPv4 trafficReview network architecture to determine if the PLC is directly accessible from untrusted networks. Check firewall rules, VLAN configuration, and whether the device is isolated from external/internet-facing network segments.Affected if The device is reachable from untrusted network segments or directly exposed to the internet
You are affected if you have a MicroLogix 1100 Series B running firmware versions 10.000 through 16.000 with IPv4 enabled and network exposure to untrusted traffic.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataIsolate affected PLCs behind network firewalls or VLANs to limit exposure to untrusted IPv4 traffic. Apply vendor firmware updates when available, and implement network monitoring to detect DoS conditions. Consider manual fault reset procedures in the incident response plan.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,816.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2020-6111 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2020-6111 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data