CVE-2021-1229
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability in ICMP Version 6 (ICMPv6) processing in Cisco NX-OS Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to cause a slow system memory leak, which over time could lead to a denial of service (DoS) condition. This vulnerability is due to improper error handling when an IPv6-configured interface receives a specific type of ICMPv6 packet. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a sustained rate of crafted ICMPv6 packets to a local IPv6 address on a targeted device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to cause a system memory leak in the ICMPv6 process on the device. As a result, the ICMPv6 process could run out of system memory and stop processing traffic. The device could then drop all ICMPv6 packets, causing traffic instability on the device. Restoring device functionality would require a device reboot.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA memory leak vulnerability exists in Cisco NX-OS Software's ICMPv6 processing due to improper error handling when an IPv6-configured interface receives a specific type of ICMPv6 packet. An attacker sending a sustained rate of crafted ICMPv6 packets to a local IPv6 address can exhaust system memory in the ICMPv6 process, causing it to stop processing traffic and drop all ICMPv6 packets, resulting in traffic instability that requires a device reboot to restore functionality.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 5.2\(1\)sv5\(1.3a\)= 8.4\(3.53\)= 15.1\(2.31\)CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify NX-OS versionRun 'show version' or 'show version | include NX-OS' to display the installed Cisco NX-OS versionAffected if The installed version matches 5.2(1)sv5(1.3a), 8.4(3.53), or 15.1(2.31)
-
Confirm IPv6 is enabledRun 'show ipv6 interface' or 'show running-config | include ipv6' to check if IPv6 is configured on any interfaceAffected if IPv6 is configured on one or more interfaces, making the ICMPv6 processing vulnerable to the attack
-
Verify ICMPv6 is not blocked at network edgeReview access-control lists (ACLs) or firewall filters applied to inbound interfaces: run 'show access-lists' and inspect for ICMPv6 deny entriesAffected if There are no ACL entries or filters blocking inbound ICMPv6 traffic from untrusted sources to the device's local IPv6 addresses
-
Check for ICMPv6 process memory issuesRun 'show system resources' or 'show process memory' and look for the icmpv6 process memory usage; compare current usage to baselineAffected if The icmpv6 process shows abnormally high memory usage or is consuming disproportionate resources
-
Monitor for ICMPv6 packet dropsRun 'show interface' or 'show ipv6 traffic' to check for ICMPv6 packet discards and error countersAffected if There is a high rate of ICMPv6 packet drops or errors indicating the process may be failing
The device is affected if it runs NX-OS version 5.2(1)sv5(1.3a), 8.4(3.53), or 15.1(2.31) with IPv6 enabled and no inbound ICMPv6 filtering in place.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply the Cisco NX-OS software patch when available. As an interim measure, consider implementing network-level filtering to block unexpected or malformed ICMPv6 packets destined for the device's local IPv6 addresses.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-1229 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-1229 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data