CVE-2021-24021
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn improper neutralization of input vulnerability [CWE-79] in FortiAnalyzer versions 6.4.3 and below, 6.2.7 and below and 6.0.10 and below may allow a remote authenticated attacker to perform a stored cross site scripting attack (XSS) via the column settings of Logview in FortiAnalyzer, should the attacker be able to obtain that POST request, via other, hypothetical attacks.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA stored cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in FortiAnalyzer's Logview column settings allows remote authenticated attackers to inject malicious script via unsanitized POST parameters in column configuration. The injected payload persists and executes when other users view the Logview interface.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 6.0.0, < 6.2.8>= 6.4.0, < 6.4.4CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify FortiAnalyzer installationLocate FortiAnalyzer in your environment and confirm it is the affected product. Check network inventory or consult your system documentation for deployment details.Affected if FortiAnalyzer is deployed in the environment
-
Check installed FortiAnalyzer versionAccess the FortiAnalyzer web UI (System > Settings > Dashboard) or use CLI command 'get system status' to retrieve the firmware version number.Affected if Version is 6.0.0 through 6.0.10, 6.2.0 through 6.2.7, or 6.4.0 through 6.4.3 (falls within < 6.2.8 or < 6.4.4)
-
Confirm Logview feature accessibilityVerify that the Logview interface is accessible to users. Log in with an authenticated account and navigate to Log View or Log View > Log Browse to confirm the feature is enabled and usable.Affected if Logview is accessible and users can interact with column settings
-
Inspect column configuration storageReview the column configuration data stored in FortiAnalyzer. In the web UI, go to Log View > Column Settings, or use CLI command 'log-viewer column-config get' if available, to examine configured columns.Affected if Any column names or settings contain unexpected characters or appear to be encoded script tags (such as <script> or javascript:)
If FortiAnalyzer is deployed with a version in the affected ranges and the Logview feature is accessible, the environment may be vulnerable to stored XSS through column configuration.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped6.2.86.4.4
Apply vendor patches: upgrade to FortiAnalyzer 6.4.4+, 6.2.8+, or 6.0.11+ to resolve the input validation failure in Logview column settings.
FortiAnalyzer 6.2.8 or later for 6.2.x branch; FortiAnalyzer 6.4.4 or later for 6.4.x branch
- 1. Identify the currently installed FortiAnalyzer version using the Web UI (System Settings > Dashboard > Status) or CLI: 'get system status'
- 2. For FortiAnalyzer 6.0.x versions: Upgrade to version 6.2.8 or later (preferably 6.4.4 or later for longer support)
- 3. For FortiAnalyzer 6.2.x versions below 6.2.8: Upgrade to version 6.2.8 or later
- 4. For FortiAnalyzer 6.4.0-6.4.3: Upgrade to version 6.4.4 or later
- 5. Download the firmware from Fortinet's support portal (https://support.fortinet.com/)
- 6. Backup the FortiAnalyzer configuration before upgrading
- 7. Upload and install the firmware via Web UI (System Settings > Firmware) or CLI: 'execute restore config <filename>' after uploading via FTP/TFTP
- 8. After upgrade, verify the version and ensure all services are operational
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation1.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,664.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-24021 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-24021 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data