FortianalyzerApplication · Fortinet

CVE-2021-32589

CRITICAL · 9.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2024-12-19
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 5.3.7 / 5.6.11 or later.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
A Use After Free (CWE-416) vulnerability in FortiManager version 7.0.0, version 6.4.5 and below, version 6.2.7 and below, version 6.0.10 and below, version 5.6.10 and below, version 5.4.7 and below, version 5.2.10 and below, version 5.0.12 and below and FortiAnalyzer version 7.0.0, version 6.4.5 and below, version 6.2.7 and below, version 6.0.10 and below, version 5.6.10 and below, version 5.4.7 and below, version 5.3.11, version 5.2.10 to 5.2.4 fgfmsd daemon may allow a remote, non-authenticated attacker to execute unauthorized code as root via sending a specifically crafted request to the fgfm port of the targeted device.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

A Use After Free (UAF) vulnerability in the fgfmsd daemon of FortiManager and FortiAnalyzer allows a remote, unauthenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code as root by sending specially crafted requests to the fgfm port.

MitigationApply the vendor-supplied patches by upgrading FortiManager and FortiAnalyzer to the fixed versions (7.0.1 or later, 6.4.6 or later, 6.2.8 or later, 6.0.11 or later, 5.6.11 or later, 5.4.8 or later, 5.2.11 or later, and 5.3.12). If immediate patching is not possible, restrict network access to the fgfm port from untrusted sources.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
FortianalyzerApplication
Affected:>= 5.2.4, < 5.6.11>= 6.0.0, < 6.0.11>= 6.2.0, < 6.2.8>= 6.4.0, < 6.4.6= 7.0.0
FortimanagerApplication
Affected:>= 5.0.0, < 5.6.11>= 6.0.0, < 6.0.11>= 6.2.0, < 6.2.8>= 6.4.0, < 6.4.6= 7.0.0
FortiportalApplication
Affected:>= 4.0.0, < 5.3.7>= 6.0.0, < 6.0.6

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify the Fortinet product
    Determine if the system is running FortiManager, FortiAnalyzer, or FortiPortal by checking system information, process lists, or product-specific files/services
    Affected if Product is FortiManager, FortiAnalyzer, or FortiPortal and the version is in the affected ranges
  2. Determine the installed version
    Use system commands or check product-specific files to obtain the exact version number installed (for example, 'diag -v' command or version display utilities)
    Affected if Installed version falls within any of the affected ranges: FortiAnalyzer >= 5.2.4 but < 5.6.11, >= 6.0.0 but < 6.0.11, >= 6.2.0 but < 6.2.8, >= 6.4.0 but < 6.4.6, or = 7.0.0; FortiManager >= 5.0.0 but < 5.6.11, >= 6.0.0 but < 6.0.11, >= 6.2.0 but < 6.2.8, >= 6.4.0 but < 6.4.6, or = 7.0.0; FortiPorta
  3. Verify fgfmsd daemon is running
    Check running processes for fgfmsd or examine listening network ports (the fgfm service typically listens on port 541)
    Affected if The fgfmsd daemon is active and the fgfm port is listening
  4. Check network exposure of fgfm port
    Examine firewall rules, access lists, or network configuration to determine if the fgfm port is accessible from untrusted network sources
    Affected if The fgfm port is reachable from network segments that are not trusted or are exposed to untrusted users

The environment is affected if it runs a vulnerable FortiManager, FortiAnalyzer, or FortiPortal version within the affected ranges AND has the fgfmsd daemon running with the fgfm port network-accessible.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 5.3.7 / 5.6.11 / 6.0.6 or later
Fixed in 5.3.75.6.116.0.6
Interim mitigation

Apply the vendor-supplied patches by upgrading FortiManager and FortiAnalyzer to the fixed versions (7.0.1 or later, 6.4.6 or later, 6.2.8 or later, 6.0.11 or later, 5.6.11 or later, 5.4.8 or later, 5.2.11 or later, and 5.3.12). If immediate patching is not possible, restrict network access to the fgfm port from untrusted sources.

Recommended fix High confidence

FortiAnalyzer: upgrade to 5.6.11, 6.0.11, 6.2.8, 6.4.6, or 7.0.1+ | FortiManager: upgrade to 5.6.11, 6.0.11, 6.2.8, 6.4.6, or 7.0.1+ | FortiPortal: upgrade to 5.3.7, 6.0.6, or later

  1. 1. Identify the currently running FortiAnalyzer, FortiManager, or FortiPortal version using the CLI command: get system status
  2. 2. Determine the appropriate upgrade path based on current version (major version upgrades may require intermediate steps)
  3. 3. Download the fixed firmware from Fortinet customer support portal: https://support.fortinet.com/
  4. 4. Backup the current configuration before upgrade
  5. 5. Upload the fixed firmware version via GUI: System > Firmware > Upload or via CLI: execute restore config <backup_file>
  6. 6. Reboot the device after firmware installation completes
  7. 7. Verify the new version is running: get system status
  8. 8. Confirm the fgfmsd daemon is operational and the vulnerability is resolved
Caveat Major version upgrades (e.g., 5.x to 6.x, 6.x to 7.x) may require configuration changes and downtime; review Fortinet upgrade guides before proceeding

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Fortianalyzer Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
20.0 hours of engineering $3,500
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,600.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-32589 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-32589 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data