CVE-2024-35275
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA improper neutralization of special elements used in an sql command ('sql injection') in Fortinet FortiAnalyzer version 7.4.0 through 7.4.2, FortiManager version 7.4.0 through 7.4.2 allows attacker to escalation of privilege via specially crafted http requests.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceSQL injection vulnerability in FortiAnalyzer and FortiManager versions 7.4.0-7.4.2 allows attackers to escalate privileges through specially crafted HTTP requests due to improper neutralization of special elements in SQL commands.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 7.4.0, < 7.4.4>= 7.4.1, < 7.4.3>= 7.4.0, < 7.4.3>= 7.4.1, < 7.4.3CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify product and versionRun 'get system status' in FortiAnalyzer/FortiManager CLI or check the web UI dashboard for the firmware version displayed under System InformationAffected if The product is FortiAnalyzer or FortiManager and the version falls within 7.4.0-7.4.3 for FMG/Faz or 7.4.0-7.4.3 for Faz Cloud or 7.4.1-7.4.2 for Faz Cloud (exact range depends on product)
-
Verify web UI or REST API is enabledRun 'get system interface' in CLI to list enabled interfaces, then check 'get system web-ui' to see if the web UI service is enabledAffected if The HTTP/HTTPS service (web UI or REST API) is enabled on any management interface accessible to attackers
-
Confirm network exposureReview interface bindings with 'config system interface' then 'show' to identify which interfaces have https or http service enabled, then determine if those interfaces are reachable from untrusted networksAffected if The management interface with web UI enabled is bound to a physical interface or VLAN accessible from external or untrusted networks
-
Check for exploitation indicatorsReview logs for SQL injection patterns: search in 'log viewer' or run 'execute log filter' looking for SQL keywords (SELECT, UNION, INSERT) in URL parameters, or check 'fdslog' for anomaly indicatorsAffected if HTTP request logs contain suspicious SQL syntax in URI parameters or body that suggest exploitation attempts
You are affected if you are running FortiAnalyzer or FortiManager version 7.4.0 through 7.4.3 (or the specific cloud version range) with the web UI or REST API enabled and accessible, especially if exposed to untrusted networks.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped7.4.37.4.4
Upgrade to Fortinet's patched version (contact Fortinet support for availability). If immediate patching is not possible, implement web application firewall rules to detect and block SQL injection attempts in HTTP requests.
FortiAnalyzer: upgrade to 7.4.4 or later | FortiAnalyzer Cloud: upgrade to 7.4.3 or later | FortiManager: upgrade to 7.4.3 or later | FortiManager Cloud: upgrade to 7.4.3 or later
- 1. Backup FortiAnalyzer/FortiManager configuration before upgrading
- 2. Download the appropriate firmware version from Fortinet support portal: FortiAnalyzer 7.4.4 or later, FortiManager 7.4.3 or later
- 3. Access FortiAnalyzer/FortiManager via CLI or web interface
- 4. Upload and install the firmware upgrade following Fortinet's standard upgrade procedure
- 5. Verify the upgrade was successful and the SQL injection vulnerability is resolved
- 6. Confirm normal operation and all services are functioning after upgrade
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,808.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-35275 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-35275 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data