CVE-2024-50563
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA weak authentication in Fortinet FortiManager Cloud, FortiAnalyzer versions 7.6.0 through 7.6.1, 7.4.1 through 7.4.3, FortiAnalyzer Cloud versions 7.4.1 through 7.4.3, FortiManager versions 7.6.0 through 7.6.1, 7.4.1 through 7.4.3, FortiManager Cloud versions 7.4.1 through 7.4.3 allows attacker to execute unauthorized code or commands via a brute-force attack.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceFortiManager and FortiAnalyzer versions 7.4.1-7.4.3 and 7.6.0-7.6.1 contain a weak authentication mechanism that can be exploited via brute-force attacks, allowing remote attackers to execute unauthorized code or commands without proper credentials.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 7.4.1, < 7.4.4>= 7.6.0, < 7.6.2>= 7.4.1, < 7.4.4>= 7.4.1, < 7.4.4>= 7.6.0, < 7.6.2>= 7.4.1, < 7.4.4CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify FortiManager or FortiAnalyzer product typeLog into the device CLI or web UI and run the command: get system status (CLI) or check System > Settings > About in the web UI to confirm whether the installed product is FortiManager, FortiAnalyzer, FortiManager Cloud, or FortiAnalyzer CloudAffected if The product type is any of these four products listed in the affected products
-
Determine the installed version numberIn CLI, run: get system status and locate the 'FortiManager version' or 'FortiAnalyzer version' field. In the web UI, go to System > Settings > About to view the firmware versionAffected if The version displayed matches the affected ranges: 7.4.1 through 7.4.3, or 7.6.0 through 7.6.1
-
Check if remote management access is enabledIn CLI, run: show system interface or get system interface to list network interfaces and their IP assignments. Look for interfaces with 'set allowaccess https http ssh' that permit external accessAffected if The management interface (port1 or others) is accessible from untrusted networks (e.g.,0.0.0.0/0 or internet-facing IPs)
-
Verify account lockout policy configurationIn the web UI, go to System Settings > Admin Settings > Security Remediation. In CLI, run: show system lockout-threshold to check if a lockout policy is configuredAffected if No lockout threshold is set, or the threshold is set too high (e.g., allowing many retry attempts before locking)
You are affected if your FortiManager or FortiAnalyzer (including Cloud variants) is running version 7.4.1 through 7.4.3 or 7.6.0 through 7.6.1 and the management interface is exposed to untrusted networks without adequate account lockout protections.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped7.4.47.6.2
Apply vendor-supplied patches for affected versions and implement rate limiting/multi-factor authentication on administrative interfaces to mitigate brute-force attempts.
FortiManager/FortiAnalyzer 7.4.4 or later; FortiManager/FortiAnalyzer 7.6.2 or later
- 1. Identify your current FortiManager or FortiAnalyzer version from the System Settings > Dashboard > System Information widget
- 2. Determine the appropriate upgrade path based on your current version branch (7.4.x or 7.6.x)
- 3. Download the fixed firmware version from the Fortinet Support Portal (fortinet.com/support)
- 4. Back up your current configuration using FortiManager/FortiAnalyzer backup functions
- 5. Upload the new firmware image via System Settings > Firmware
- 6. Initiate the firmware upgrade and allow the system to reboot
- 7. After reboot, verify the new version is installed and confirm all services are operational
- 8. Verify the vulnerability is resolved by checking the installed version matches the fixed release
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation8.0 h
- Implementation16.0 h
- Testing12.0 h
- Review / QA8.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $12,352.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-50563 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-50563 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data