CVE-2021-26092
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedFailure to sanitize input in the SSL VPN web portal of FortiOS 5.2.10 through 5.2.15, 5.4.0 through 5.4.13, 5.6.0 through 5.6.14, 6.0.0 through 6.0.12, 6.2.0 through 6.2.7, 6.4.0 through 6.4.4; and FortiProxy 1.2.0 through 1.2.9, 2.0.0 through 2.0.1 may allow a remote unauthenticated attacker to perform a reflected Cross-site Scripting (XSS) attack by sending a request to the error page with malicious GET parameters.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceReflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the SSL VPN web portal of FortiOS and FortiProxy allows remote unauthenticated attackers to inject malicious JavaScript via unsanitized GET parameters submitted to the error page.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 1.2.0, <= 1.2.9= 2.0.0= 2.0.1>= 5.2.10, <= 5.2.15>= 5.4.0, <= 5.4.13>= 5.6.0, <= 5.6.14>= 6.0.0, <= 6.0.12>= 6.2.0, <= 6.2.7>= 6.4.0, <= 6.4.4CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the product typeRun 'get system status' via FortiOS/FortiProxy CLI or check the device model via web UI. FortiProxy devices will show as 'FortiProxy' in the model field.Affected if The device is a FortiOS or FortiProxy appliance
-
Determine the firmware versionRun 'get system status' via CLI. The output displays the firmware version (for example: FortiOS v6.0.12 or FortiProxy v2.0.1).Affected if The version falls within the affected ranges: FortiProxy 1.2.0-1.2.9, 2.0.0-2.0.1; FortiOS 5.2.10-5.2.15, 5.4.0-5.4.13, 5.6.0-5.6.14, 6.0.0-6.0.12, 6.2.0-6.2.7, or 6.4.0-6.4.4
-
Verify SSL VPN web portal is enabledRun 'get vpn ssl settings' via CLI. Look for 'set ssl-port' (typically 443) and confirm the service is active. Alternatively, check via web UI under VPN > SSL-VPN Settings.Affected if The SSL VPN web portal is enabled and accessible (ssl-port is configured and status is active)
-
Confirm the SSL VPN portal is externally accessibleAttempt to reach the SSL VPN login page externally via the public IP or hostname on the configured SSL port (usually 443). The vulnerability exists on the error page triggered by malformed GET parameters.Affected if The SSL VPN portal is reachable from untrusted networks (internet-facing)
A user is affected if they run an unpatched FortiOS or FortiProxy version within the affected ranges AND have the SSL VPN web portal enabled and accessible.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply the vendor-supplied patches by upgrading FortiOS to version 5.2.16+, 5.4.14+, 5.6.15+, 6.0.13+, 6.2.8+, 6.4.5+ and FortiProxy to version 1.2.10+ or 2.0.2+ as specified in the Fortinet security advisory.
FortiOS: 5.2.16+, 5.4.14+, 5.6.15+, 6.0.13+, 6.2.8+, 6.4.5+ | FortiProxy: 1.2.10+, 2.0.2+
- 1. Identify the currently installed FortiOS or FortiProxy version using the web UI or CLI command 'get system status'
- 2. For FortiOS 5.2.x: Upgrade to version 5.2.16 or later
- 3. For FortiOS 5.4.x: Upgrade to version 5.4.14 or later
- 4. For FortiOS 5.6.x: Upgrade to version 5.6.15 or later
- 5. For FortiOS 6.0.x: Upgrade to version 6.0.13 or later
- 6. For FortiOS 6.2.x: Upgrade to version 6.2.8 or later
- 7. For FortiOS 6.4.x: Upgrade to version 6.4.5 or later
- 8. For FortiProxy 1.2.x: Upgrade to version 1.2.10 or later
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,728.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-26092 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-26092 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data