CVE-2021-26336
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedInsufficient bounds checking in System Management Unit (SMU) may cause invalid memory accesses/updates that could result in SMU hang and subsequent failure to service any further requests from other components.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceInsufficient bounds checking in AMD's System Management Unit (SMU) firmware allows invalid memory accesses and updates, leading to SMU hang and complete failure to service subsequent requests from other system components, effectively causing a denial-of-service condition.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< milanpi-sp3_1.0.0.4< romepi-sp3_1.0.0.c< milanpi-sp3_1.0.0.4< milanpi-sp3_1.0.0.4< milanpi-sp3_1.0.0.4< milanpi-sp3_1.0.0.4< milanpi-sp3_1.0.0.4< milanpi-sp3_1.0.0.4CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify your AMD Epyc processor modelRun 'dmidecode -t processor' or check system BIOS/UEFI under processor information to determine if you have an Epyc 7003, 7002, 72f3, 7313, 7313p, 7343, 73f3, or 7413 processorAffected if The processor model matches one of the affected Epyc models listed in the CVE (7003, 7002, 72f3, 7313, 7313p, 7343, 73f3, or 7413)
-
Check SMU firmware version via BMC/IPMIUse IPMI command 'ipmitool raw' or access BMC web interface to retrieve SMU firmware version. On HP/Dell/Lenovo servers, use their respective management tools (HP iLO, Dell iDRAC, Lenovo XClarity). The SMU firmware version is typically shown in the BIOS/firmware inventory sectionAffected if The SMU firmware version is revealed and can be compared against the vulnerable version thresholds
-
Check SMU firmware version via system BIOSEnter BIOS/UEFI setup during boot and navigate to System Information or Firmware Versions section to locate the SMU firmware version. Some systems display this on the initial boot screen under firmware informationAffected if The SMU firmware version is displayed and can be compared against the vulnerable version thresholds
-
Compare installed version to affected thresholdsMatch your processor model and SMU firmware version against the CVE version thresholds: Epyc 7003/72f3/7313/7313p/7343/73f3/7413 require < milanpi-sp3_1.0.0.4; Epyc 7002 requires < romepi-sp3_1.0.0.c. If your version is lower than the threshold, you are affectedAffected if The installed SMU firmware version is below the fixed version for your specific processor model (milanpi-sp3_1.0.0.4 for 7003/72f3/7313/7313p/7343/73f3/7413, or romepi-sp3_1.0.0.c for 7002)
You are affected if you have an AMD Epyc 7002, 7003, 72f3, 7313, 7313p, 7343, 73f3, or 7413 processor AND your installed SMU firmware version is lower than the fixed version threshold for your specific model.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply AMD-provided SMU firmware updates (typically delivered via BIOS/UEFI updates) to patch the bounds checking vulnerabilities; verify SMU stability post-update.
milanpi-sp3_1.0.0.4 (for Epyc 7003/72f3/7313/7313p/7343/73f3/7413) or romepi-sp3_1.0.0.c (for Epyc 7002)
- 1. Identify the exact AMD Epyc processor model (7002, 7003, 72f3, 7313, 7313p, 7343, 73f3, or 7413) in the affected system.
- 2. Check the current firmware version of the System Management Unit (SMU) - this is typically viewable via IPMI, BMC web interface, or AMD's platform management tools.
- 3. For Epyc 7002 systems: upgrade SMU firmware to version romepi-sp3_1.0.0.c or later.
- 4. For Epyc 7003, 72f3, 7313, 7313p, 7343, 73f3, and 7413 systems: upgrade SMU firmware to version milanpi-sp3_1.0.0.4 or later.
- 5. Obtain the firmware update utility and firmware binary from AMD's support website (www.amd.com) or through the server OEM's firmware distribution channel.
- 6. Apply the firmware update following the OEM's recommended procedure - this usually involves rebooting the server or using a firmware update tool via the BMC/IPMI interface.
- 7. After updating, verify the SMU firmware version has been successfully applied and confirm the system is operating normally.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,968.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-26336 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-26336 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data