CVE-2021-26353
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedFailure to validate inputs in SMM may allow an attacker to create a mishandled error leaving the DRTM UApp in a partially initialized state potentially resulting in loss of memory integrity.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThis is a System Management Mode (SMM) vulnerability in AMD processors where input validation failures allow an attacker to create a mishandled error condition. This leaves the DRTM (Dynamic Root of Trust Measurement) UApp in a partially initialized state, compromising memory integrity protections.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< milanpi-sp3_1.0.0.4< milanpi-sp3_1.0.0.4< milanpi-sp3_1.0.0.4< milanpi-sp3_1.0.0.4< milanpi-sp3_1.0.0.4< milanpi-sp3_1.0.0.4< milanpi-sp3_1.0.0.4< milanpi-sp3_1.0.0.4CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the AMD Epyc processor modelRun `dmidecode -t processor | grep -E 'Version|Model'` or `lscpu | grep 'Model name'` to retrieve the processor model informationAffected if The processor model matches one of the affected variants: Epyc 7763, 7713p, 7713, 7663, 7643, 75f3, 7543p, or 7543
-
Check the system firmware versionRun `dmidecode -s bios-version` or access the BMC/IPMI interface to retrieve the current BIOS/firmware version for the AMD Epyc systemAffected if The firmware version is present and is earlier than milanpi-sp3_1.0.0.4 (for example, 1.0.0.3 or any version below 1.0.0.4)
-
Verify if DRTM is enabled on the systemCheck the BIOS/UEFI settings for DRTM (Dynamic Root of Trust Measurement) or use OS-level tools such as `tpm2_getcap -c pcrs` to inspect TPM-related configurations; consult system documentation for DRTM statusAffected if DRTM is enabled and the system uses the DRTM UApp functionality, as the vulnerability affects the partially initialized state of DRTM
A system is affected if it runs one of the listed AMD Epyc processor models with firmware versions below milanpi-sp3_1.0.0.4 and has DRTM enabled, which leaves the DRTM UApp vulnerable to the input validation flaw.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply vendor-supplied BIOS/firmware updates from AMD and system manufacturers. This is a firmware-level issue requiring SMM/UEFI updates rather than software patches.
milanpi-sp3_1.0.0.4 or later
- 1. Identify the exact AMD Epyc processor model(s) in your system from the affected list (7763, 7713p, 7713, 7663, 7643, 75f3, 7543p, 7543)
- 2. Determine the current firmware version installed on the affected processor(s)
- 3. Navigate to www.amd.com and locate the AMD Epyc 7000 series (Milan) firmware download page
- 4. Download the firmware update package milanpi-sp3_1.0.0.4 or later version for your specific processor model
- 5. Review the firmware update documentation and release notes for any specific installation requirements
- 6. Apply the firmware update following AMD's recommended procedures, which typically involves using the AMD firmware update utility or through system BIOS/UEFI update mechanisms
- 7. After update completion, verify the firmware version has been successfully updated to milanpi-sp3_1.0.0.4 or later
- 8. Confirm the DRTM UApp initialization completes properly after the update
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,888.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-26353 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-26353 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data