CVE-2021-26370
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedImproper validation of destination address in SVC_LOAD_FW_IMAGE_BY_INSTANCE and SVC_LOAD_BINARY_BY_ATTRIB in a malicious UApp or ABL may allow an attacker to overwrite arbitrary bootloader memory with SPI ROM contents resulting in a loss of integrity and availability.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThis is a memory corruption vulnerability in AMD bootloader components (UApp/ABL) where the SVC_LOAD_FW_IMAGE_BY_INSTANCE and SVC_LOAD_BINARY_BY_ATTRIB functions fail to properly validate destination addresses. A malicious UApp or ABL can trigger arbitrary memory writes to the bootloader region using data from SPI ROM, allowing an attacker to overwrite bootloader memory contents.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< milanpi-sp3_1.0.0.4< milanpi-sp3_1.0.0.4< milanpi-sp3_1.0.0.4< milanpi-sp3_1.0.0.4< milanpi-sp3_1.0.0.4< milanpi-sp3_1.0.0.4< milanpi-sp3_1.0.0.4< milanpi-sp3_1.0.0.4CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the AMD Epyc processor modelRun 'dmidecode -t processor' or check system inventory to confirm the exact Epyc model number (e.g., 7763, 7713p, 7713, 7663, 7643, 75f3, 7543p, 7543)Affected if The processor model matches one of the listed affected models (7763, 7713p, 7713, 7663, 7643, 75f3, 7543p, 7543)
-
Retrieve the current firmware versionRun 'dmidecode -s bios-version' or check the BMC/web interface for firmware/BIOS version information. For AMD Epyc Milan, look for a version string containing 'milanpi-sp3'Affected if The firmware version cannot be determined or is not visible from the operating system (firmware checks require BMC/host console access)
-
Compare firmware version against the fixed releaseIf a firmware version is visible, compare it to 'milanpi-sp3_1.0.0.4'. Versions lower than 1.0.0.4 (e.g., 1.0.0.3, 0.x.x.x) are within the affected rangeAffected if The installed firmware version is below milanpi-sp3_1.0.0.4 (e.g., milanpi-sp3_1.0.0.3 or earlier)
-
Verify bootloader component version if accessibleAccess the BMC or host console to inspect bootloader (UApp/ABL) version information. This may require vendor-specific tools or firmware dump utilitiesAffected if The bootloader version cannot be verified externally and the system runs firmware versions prior to the milanpi-sp3_1.0.0.4 release
A system is affected if it uses an AMD Epyc 7000-series Milan processor (7763, 7713p, 7713, 7663, 7643, 75f3, 7543p, or 7543) with bootloader firmware version earlier than milanpi-sp3_1.0.0.4.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply the vendor-provided firmware update that includes proper destination address validation in the affected bootloader functions. Prioritize systems where untrusted UApps can be loaded or where ABL can be modified.
milanpi-sp3_1.0.0.4 (or later)
- 1. Identify the exact AMD Epyc processor model (e.g., Epyc 7763, Epyc 7713p, etc.) in the affected system
- 2. Visit the AMD support website (www.amd.com) and navigate to the drivers and support section for AMD Epyc 7003 series (Milan) processors
- 3. Download the firmware update package labeled 'milanpi-sp3_1.0.0.4' or later for your specific processor model
- 4. Apply the firmware update following AMD's standard firmware update procedure, typically through the system's BIOS/UEFI update utility or AMD's dedicated firmware update tools
- 5. After the update completes, verify that the firmware version has been updated to milanpi-sp3_1.0.0.4 or newer
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing12.0 h
- Review / QA6.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $8,192.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-26370 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-26370 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data