Manageengine Servicedesk Plus MspApplication · Zohocorp

CVE-2021-31531

CRITICAL · 9.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2021-06-29
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 10.5 or later.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Zoho ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus MSP before 10521 is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF).

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

Zoho ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus MSP versions before 10521 contain a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability. This flaw allows remote attackers to make the application server perform arbitrary requests to internal or external resources, potentially bypassing network restrictions and accessing sensitive internal services.

MitigationUpgrade to ServiceDesk Plus MSP version 10521 or later to remediate this vulnerability.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Manageengine Servicedesk Plus MspApplication
Affected:< 10.5= 10.5

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify ServiceDesk Plus MSP version
    Log into the ServiceDesk Plus MSP admin console and navigate to the About or Version section (typically found in Admin > General Settings or Help > About). Alternatively, check the version.txt or versioninfo file in the installation directory.
    Affected if The displayed version is 10.5 or any version lower than 10.5 (the vulnerable range includes versions < 10.5 and = 10.5).
  2. Confirm the build number
    In the same About section, note the full build number or patch version. Compare it against the fixed build 10521.
    Affected if The build number is lower than 10521, indicating an unpatched installation.
  3. Verify web interface exposure
    Determine if the ServiceDesk Plus MSP web interface is accessible from the network. This vulnerability can be exploited through HTTP requests to the application.
    Affected if The web interface is externally accessible without proper network segmentation, allowing potential attackers to trigger SSRF requests.

You are affected if your installed ServiceDesk Plus MSP version is 10.5 or below (build < 10521) and the web interface is network-accessible, as the SSRF flaw allows attackers to force your server to make arbitrary requests to internal or external resources.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 10.5 or later
Fixed in 10.5
Interim mitigation

Upgrade to ServiceDesk Plus MSP version 10521 or later to remediate this vulnerability.

Recommended fix Moderate confidence

ServiceDesk Plus MSP 10.5 build 10521 or later

  1. Download ServiceDesk Plus MSP version 10.5 build 10521 or later from the official ManageEngine website (www.manageengine.com)
  2. Back up the current ServiceDesk Plus MSP database and configuration files
  3. Stop the ServiceDesk Plus MSP service
  4. Install the upgraded version following the standard upgrade procedure
  5. Restart the ServiceDesk Plus MSP service
  6. Verify the application is running correctly and the SSRF vulnerability is remediated

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Manageengine Servicedesk Plus Msp Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation2.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
11.0 hours of engineering $1,920
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,072.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-31531 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-31531 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data