FortiwebApplication · Fortinet

CVE-2021-36187

HIGH · 7.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2021-11-02
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 6.3.15 or later.
See remediation →
84/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
A uncontrolled resource consumption in Fortinet FortiWeb version 6.4.0, version 6.3.15 and below, 6.2.5 and below allows attacker to cause a denial of service for webserver daemon via crafted HTTP requests

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

FortiWeb's webserver daemon suffers from uncontrolled resource consumption when processing specially crafted HTTP requests, leading to denial of service. This is a resource exhaustion or memory leak vulnerability in the HTTP parsing layer.

MitigationUpgrade FortiWeb to version 6.4.1, 6.3.16, 6.2.6 or later to patch the vulnerability. If immediate patching is not possible, consider rate limiting or restricting HTTP access to trusted sources at upstream devices.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
FortiwebApplication
Affected:>= 6.2.0, <= 6.2.5>= 6.3.0, <= 6.3.15= 6.4.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Retrieve FortiWeb firmware version
    Log into FortiWeb CLI and run: get system status
    Affected if The displayed version falls within 6.2.0-6.2.5, 6.3.0-6.3.15, or equals 6.4.0
  2. Confirm HTTP service is enabled
    Verify the FortiWeb webserver daemon is active by checking HTTP/HTTPS listeners: show system interface | grep -A5 http
    Affected if HTTP or HTTPS service is listening (this is the default configuration for FortiWeb)

You are affected if FortiWeb is running version 6.2.0 through 6.2.5, 6.3.0 through 6.3.15, or exactly 6.4.0 and the HTTP webserver service is enabled.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 6.3.15
Interim mitigation

Upgrade FortiWeb to version 6.4.1, 6.3.16, 6.2.6 or later to patch the vulnerability. If immediate patching is not possible, consider rate limiting or restricting HTTP access to trusted sources at upstream devices.

Recommended fix High confidence

Upgrade to FortiWeb 6.2.6+ (6.2.x branch), 6.3.16+ (6.3.x branch), or 6.4.1+ (6.4.x branch) - choose the latest available version in your current branch

  1. 1. Identify the current FortiWeb version by navigating to System > Firmware in the FortiWeb GUI or using 'get system status' in CLI
  2. 2. Based on your current version branch, plan the upgrade: If running 6.2.x, upgrade to 6.2.6 or later; if running 6.3.x, upgrade to 6.3.16 or later; if running 6.4.0, upgrade to 6.4.1 or later
  3. 3. Download the appropriate firmware from Fortinet's support portal (https://support.fortinet.com)
  4. 4. Back up the FortiWeb configuration via System > Maintenance > Backup & Restore in GUI or 'execute backup full-config' in CLI
  5. 5. Upload the new firmware via System > Firmware > Upgrade in GUI or 'execute firmware upgrade' in CLI
  6. 6. After reboot, verify the upgrade was successful and confirm the new version via 'get system status'
  7. 7. Test critical FortiWeb functionality including web application firewall policies and traffic processing
Caveat Standard firmware upgrade risks apply - ensure configuration backup before upgrading; may require brief service interruption

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Fortiweb Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
13.0 hours of engineering $2,280
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,648.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-36187 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-36187 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data