CVE-2021-3792
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedSome device communications in some Motorola-branded Binatone Hubble Cameras with backend Hubble services are not encrypted which could lead to the communication channel being accessible by an attacker.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceUnencrypted device communications between Motorola-branded Binatone Hubble Cameras and their Hubble backend services allow attackers on the same network to intercept sensitive data in transit, potentially exposing video feeds, credentials, or command traffic.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 03.50.14< 03.40.02< 03.40.00all versions< 03.40.00all versionsall versionsall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the camera modelLocate the device label or access the camera's web interface or mobile app to determine the exact model name (e.g., Binatoneglobal Halo+, Comfort 85 Connect, Mbp3855, Focus 68, Focus 72r, Cn28, Cn50, Comfort 40).Affected if The model is any of the Binatoneglobal cameras listed in the affected products.
-
Determine the firmware versionAccess the camera settings via its web interface or mobile app and navigate to the 'About' or 'Device Info' section to view the installed firmware version.Affected if The firmware version falls below the threshold for the specific model (Halo+ < 03.50.14, Comfort 85 Connect < 03.40.02, Mbp3855 < 03.40.00, Focus 72r < 03.40.00) or if the model has 'all versions' affected.
-
Verify Hubble cloud service statusAccess the camera settings and check whether the Hubble cloud connectivity or 'Hubble' service is enabled. This is typically found under 'Cloud Settings', 'Remote Access', or 'Hubble' in the camera configuration.Affected if The Hubble cloud service is turned on, as this is the backend service with which the camera communicates unencrypted.
-
Inspect network traffic for encryptionUse a network packet capture tool (such as Wireshark or tcpdump) on the same network segment as the camera to capture traffic destined for Hubble servers. Analyze the protocol and look for unencrypted HTTP traffic rather than HTTPS.Affected if Traffic to Hubble backend servers uses plain HTTP (port 80) instead of encrypted HTTPS (port 443) or TLS.
A user is affected if they own one of the listed Binatoneglobal camera models, are running an affected firmware version, and have the Hubble cloud service enabled with unencrypted network communications.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped03.40.0003.40.0203.50.14
Isolate affected cameras on a dedicated VLAN with network monitoring; if devices cannot be patched, replace with models supporting encrypted communications or disable Hubble cloud services.
Halo+ Camera: 03.50.14+ | Comfort 85 Connect: 03.40.02+ | Mbp3855: 03.40.00+ | Focus 72r: 03.40.00+ | Focus 68/Cn28/Cn50/Comfort 40: any version with encryption added (contact binatoneglobal.com for specific release)
- 1. Identify the specific camera model from the affected product list (Halo+ Camera, Comfort 85 Connect, Mbp3855, Focus 68, Focus 72r, Cn28, Cn50, or Comfort 40)
- 2. Check the current firmware version installed on the device through the device settings or Hubble app
- 3. Download the appropriate firmware update from binatoneglobal.com or through the Hubble app
- 4. Follow the manufacturer's instructions to apply the firmware update to the device
- 5. Verify the update was successful by checking the firmware version in device settings
- 6. Ensure future device communications occur over encrypted channels
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-3792 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-3792 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data