CVE-2021-39111
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe Editor plugin in Atlassian Jira Server and Data Center before version 8.5.18, from 8.6.0 before 8.13.10, and from version 8.14.0 before 8.18.2 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary HTML or JavaScript via a Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the handling of supplied content such as from a PDF when pasted into a field such as the description field.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Atlassian Jira Server and Data Center's Editor plugin allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary HTML or JavaScript through content pasted (e.g., from PDF files) into fields such as the description field. The vulnerability stems from insufficient sanitization of pasted content in the editor component.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 8.5.18< 8.5.18>= 8.6.0, < 8.13.10>= 8.14.0, < 8.18.2>= 8.6.0, < 8.13.10>= 8.14.0, < 8.18.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check Jira versionNavigate to Jira Administration > System > System Info or run the command: java -jar atlassian-jira-core*.jar --version. Alternatively, check the <jira-install>/atlassian-jira/WEB-INF/classes/build.properties file for the jira.version property.Affected if The installed version is less than 8.5.18, or falls between 8.6.0 and 8.13.10 (exclusive), or between 8.14.0 and 8.18.2 (exclusive)
-
Identify Jira deployment typeConfirm whether the instance is Jira Server, Jira Data Center, or Jira Core/Software by checking the system info page or the license details in Administration > Applications.Affected if The deployment type matches Atlassian Data Center or Atlassian Jira Server and the version falls into the affected ranges listed in the CVE
-
Verify Editor plugin is activeNavigate to Jira Administration > Apps > Manage apps and locate the 'Jira Editor' or 'Editor' plugin. Confirm its status is 'Enabled'.Affected if The Editor plugin is enabled, which is the default state and required for the vulnerability to be exploitable
-
Confirm paste functionality is availableCreate or edit a test issue and verify that the description field accepts pasted content. This is enabled by default in Jira's rich text editor.Affected if The description field accepts pasted content, which is the default behavior and necessary for the XSS vector
The instance is affected if it runs a Jira Server or Data Center version that falls within the vulnerable ranges (< 8.5.18, 8.6.0 to < 8.13.10, or 8.14.0 to < 8.18.2) and has the Editor plugin enabled with paste functionality available (default configuration).
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped8.5.188.13.108.18.2
Upgrade Jira Server/Data Center to version 8.5.18 or later, 8.13.10 or later, or 8.18.2 or later to receive the patch. Alternatively, implement content filtering for pasted content in description fields as a compensating control.
8.5.18, 8.13.10, or 8.18.2 (or later stable release)
- 1. Identify current Jira version by navigating to Jira Administration > System > System Info
- 2. Determine if current version is affected: versions < 8.5.18, OR >= 8.6.0 and < 8.13.10, OR >= 8.14.0 and < 8.18.2
- 3. If affected, plan upgrade to a fixed release
- 4. Backup Jira database and home directory before upgrade
- 5. Test upgrade in staging/non-production environment first
- 6. Apply upgrade following Atlassian upgrade documentation
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,224.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-39111 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-39111 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data