CVE-2021-41616
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedApache DB DdlUtils 1.0 included a BinaryObjectsHelper that was intended for use when migrating database data with a SQL data type of BINARY, VARBINARY, LONGVARBINARY, or BLOB between databases using the ddlutils features. The BinaryObjectsHelper class was insecure and used ObjectInputStream.readObject without validating that the input data was safe to deserialize. Please note that DdlUtils is no longer being actively developed. To address the insecurity of the BinaryObjectHelper class, the following changes to DdlUtils have been made: (1) BinaryObjectsHelper.java has been deleted from the DdlUtils source repository and the DdlUtils feature of propagating data of SQL binary types is therefore no longer present in DdlUtils; (2) The ddlutils-1.0 release has been removed from the Apache Release Distribution Infrastructure; (3) The DdlUtils web site has been updated to indicate that DdlUtils is now available only as source code, not as a packaged release.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceApache DdlUtils 1.0 contained an insecure deserialization vulnerability in the BinaryObjectsHelper class, which used ObjectInputStream.readObject without validating input when migrating data with SQL binary types (BINARY, VARBINARY, LONGVARBINARY, BLOB). This allowed remote code execution. The vulnerable class and entire feature have been removed from DdlUtils.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 1.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify DdlUtils 1.0 in dependenciesSearch your project build files (pom.xml, build.gradle), lib directories, and WAR/EAR archives for the DdlUtils 1.0 JAR fileAffected if Apache DdlUtils version 1.0 is present in the project dependencies or classpath
-
Locate the BinaryObjectsHelper classSearch the compiled classes or JAR files for the class named 'BinaryObjectsHelper' in the org.apache.ddlutils packageAffected if The BinaryObjectsHelper class exists in the runtime classpath
-
Detect binary column migration usageReview application code and configuration for usage of DdlUtils schema reading/writing operations involving BINARY, VARBINARY, LONGVARBINARY, or BLOB column typesAffected if The application uses DdlUtils to read or write database schemas containing binary column types
-
Check for deserialization gadget usageAnalyze network traffic or application logs for serialization/deserialization operations when DdlUtils processes binary data from databasesAffected if DdlUtils is actively processing binary data from SQL queries or writing binary data to databases using object serialization
A user is affected if Apache DdlUtils 1.0 is present in the application and the binary column migration feature is being used to read or write BINARY, VARBINARY, LONGVARBINARY, or BLOB data types.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedRemove the DdlUtils 1.0 dependency entirely from any affected applications; if binary data migration capability is needed, implement an alternative solution that does not use Java object serialization.
- 1. Discontinue use of Apache DdlUtils 1.0 as it is no longer maintained or distributed.
- 2. The vulnerable BinaryObjectsHelper class has been deleted from the source repository; the feature for propagating SQL binary type data no longer exists.
- 3. Since DdlUtils 1.0 release has been removed from Apache's distribution infrastructure, obtain the current source code only from the Apache DdlUtils source repository if absolutely necessary.
- 4. If you must use DdlUtils, review any deserialization implementation in your code that interacts with ObjectInputStream and ensure input validation is applied.
- 5. Consider migrating to actively maintained alternatives for database schema and data migration tasks.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,600.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-41616 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-41616 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data