CVE-2021-44549
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedApache Sling Commons Messaging Mail provides a simple layer on top of JavaMail/Jakarta Mail for OSGi to send mails via SMTPS. To reduce the risk of "man in the middle" attacks additional server identity checks must be performed when accessing mail servers. For compatibility reasons these additional checks are disabled by default in JavaMail/Jakarta Mail. The SimpleMailService in Apache Sling Commons Messaging Mail 1.0 lacks an option to enable these checks for the shared mail session. A user could enable these checks nevertheless by accessing the session via the message created by SimpleMessageBuilder and setting the property mail.smtps.ssl.checkserveridentity to true. Apache Sling Commons Messaging Mail 2.0 adds support for enabling server identity checks and these checks are enabled by default. - https://javaee.github.io/javamail/docs/SSLNOTES.txt - https://javaee.github.io/javamail/docs/api/com/sun/mail/smtp/package-summary.html - https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/mail/issues/429
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceApache Sling Commons Messaging Mail versions prior to 2.0 lack an option to enable SSL/TLS server identity checks in shared mail sessions, allowing potential man-in-the-middle attacks. While users could manually set mail.smtps.ssl.checkserveridentity to true via SimpleMessageBuilder, version 2.0 adds proper support and enables these checks by default.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 1.0.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed version of Apache Sling Commons Messaging MailLocate the commons-messaging-mail JAR file in your application classpath or build configuration (pom.xml, build.gradle, lib directory) and check the version metadata in the JAR manifest or dependency declarationAffected if The version is 1.0.0 or any version prior to 2.0 (such as 1.x releases)
-
Locate SimpleMessageBuilder configurationSearch project source code and configuration files for usage of SimpleMessageBuilder class from Apache Sling Commons Messaging MailAffected if SimpleMessageBuilder is used to create mail sessions in your environment
-
Check for manual server identity verification settingInspect SimpleMessageBuilder configuration code and any associated property files for the setting mail.smtps.ssl.checkserveridentityAffected if The property mail.smtps.ssl.checkserveridentity is not set to true, or is absent entirely
-
Inspect mail session configuration filesExamine any XML, properties, or OSGi configuration files that define shared mail session settings for mail.smtps.ssl.checkserveridentityAffected if Server identity checking is not explicitly enabled (value is not true)
You are affected if Apache Sling Commons Messaging Mail version 1.0.0 (or any pre-2.0 version) is in use AND the mail.smtps.ssl.checkserveridentity property is not explicitly set to true in your configuration.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade to Apache Sling Commons Messaging Mail 2.0 or later where server identity checks are enabled by default, or manually configure mail.smtps.ssl.checkserveridentity=true in the message session.
Apache Sling Commons Messaging Mail 2.0.x
- Upgrade Apache Sling Commons Messaging Mail from version 1.0.0 to version 2.0.x
- In version 2.0, server identity checks are enabled by default for SMTPS connections, providing protection against man-in-the-middle attacks
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,224.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2021-44549 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2021-44549 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data