M Files ServerApplication · M Files

CVE-2022-1911

MEDIUM · 5.3 CVSS v3.1 Published 2022-11-30
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 22.6.11534.4 or later.
See remediation →
62/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Error in parser function in M-Files Server versions before 22.6.11534.1 and before 22.6.11505.0 allowed unauthenticated access to some information of the underlying operating system.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

A parser function in M-Files Server versions prior to 22.6.11534.1 and 22.6.11505.0 contains an error that allows unauthenticated remote attackers to retrieve certain information about the underlying operating system without authentication credentials.

MitigationUpgrade M-Files Server to version 22.6.11534.1 or later (or 22.6.11505.0 or later for the 22.6 branch) to remediate this vulnerability. Verify the fix in a non-production environment before deploying to production.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
M Files ServerApplication
Affected:< 22.6.11534.4

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
None
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Verify M-Files Server is installed
    Check for M-Files Server process or service running on the system. On Windows, open Services and look for 'M-Files Server' or check Task Manager for M-Files processes.
    Affected if M-Files Server process or service is found running on the host
  2. Determine installed M-Files Server version
    Open M-Files Admin, navigate to the server node, and view the version information displayed in the general settings. Alternatively, check the program version through Add/Remove Programs or the installation directory for version files.
    Affected if Unable to confirm the version or version displayed is below 22.6.11534.4
  3. Compare version against affected range
    If you have the version number, compare it numerically to 22.6.11534.4. Versions below this threshold (including versions prior to 22.6.11534.1 and 22.6.11505.0) are affected.
    Affected if Installed version is less than 22.6.11534.4
  4. Assess network exposure of M-Files Server
    Verify whether M-Files Server is accessible from untrusted networks or the internet. Check firewall rules and network configuration to determine if the M-Files web interface or API ports are exposed without proper authentication barriers.
    Affected if M-Files Server is accessible to unauthenticated network callers

The environment is affected if M-Files Server is running with a version lower than 22.6.11534.4 and is network-accessible to unauthenticated users.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 22.6.11534.4 or later
Fixed in 22.6.11534.4
Interim mitigation

Upgrade M-Files Server to version 22.6.11534.1 or later (or 22.6.11505.0 or later for the 22.6 branch) to remediate this vulnerability. Verify the fix in a non-production environment before deploying to production.

Recommended fix Moderate confidence

M-Files Server 22.6.11534.4 or later

  1. 1. Back up the current M-Files Server database and configuration
  2. 2. Download M-Files Server version 22.6.11534.4 or later from the official M-Files portal
  3. 3. Stop the M-Files Server service
  4. 4. Install the new version of M-Files Server
  5. 5. Verify the parser function no longer exposes operating system information
  6. 6. Restart the M-Files Server service

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in M Files Server Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
14.0 hours of engineering $2,380
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,808.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-1911 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-1911 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data