CVE-2022-4862
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedRendering of HTML provided by another authenticated user is possible in browser on M-Files Web before 22.12.12140.3. This allows the content to steal user sensitive information. This issue affects M-Files New Web: before 22.12.12140.3.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThis is a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in M-Files New Web where authenticated users can inject malicious HTML content that gets rendered in other users' browsers. This allows attackers to execute scripts in victim browsers and steal sensitive information such as session cookies or credentials.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 22.12.12140.3CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify M-Files Server installation and versionLocate the M-Files Server installation and retrieve the installed version number. This is typically available through the M-Files admin interface, the installed programs list, or the M-Files server documentation for version retrieval methods.Affected if The installed version is lower than 22.12.12140.3
-
Confirm M-Files New Web is enabledVerify whether the M-Files New Web interface is enabled and accessible to users. Check the M-Files Server configuration settings or admin console for the New Web status.Affected if M-Files New Web interface is enabled and accessible to users
-
Check for user content creation featuresDetermine if authenticated users have the ability to create, edit, or upload content that could contain HTML or rich text. Review the vault settings and user permissions related to content creation.Affected if Users can create or modify content that supports HTML or rich text formatting
-
Review audit logs for suspicious contentExamine M-Files audit logs or recent user-created content for any entries containing HTML tags, script elements, or unusual character sequences that could indicate exploitation attempts.Affected if Evidence of HTML or script tags being stored and rendered in user content
You are affected if M-Files Server version is below 22.12.12140.3 AND the M-Files New Web interface is enabled, allowing authenticated users to inject and store malicious HTML content that gets rendered in other users' browsers.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped22.12.12140.3
Upgrade M-Files New Web to version 22.12.12140.3 or later to patch the HTML injection vulnerability. Alternatively, restrict or sanitize user-provided HTML content until the patch can be applied.
M-Files Server 22.12.12140.3 or later
- Identify the current M-Files Server version by checking the About section in M-Files Admin or the server configuration
- Create a full backup of the M-Files vault and configuration, including the database
- Download M-Files Server version 22.12.12140.3 or later from the official M-Files download portal
- Run the M-Files Server installer and follow the upgrade wizard instructions
- Complete the upgrade and verify the server starts successfully
- Confirm the new version is 22.12.12140.3 or higher by checking About in M-Files Admin
- Test that the New Web interface renders content correctly and the XSS vulnerability is resolved
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,648.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-4862 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-4862 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data