CVE-2024-10127
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAuthentication bypass condition in LDAP authentication in M-Files server versions before 24.11 supported usage of OpenLDAP configurations that allowed user authentication without a password when the LDAP server itself had the vulnerable configuration.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceM-Files server versions before 24.11 contain an authentication bypass vulnerability in their LDAP authentication module. The vulnerability is triggered when connecting to OpenLDAP servers that are configured to allow user authentication without a password, which M-Files improperly accepts, allowing unauthenticated access.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 24.8.13981.13< 24.11CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Determine installed M-Files Server versionAccess the M-Files Server administration interface or check the installed software version through system information. In the M-Files admin interface, navigate to the 'About' section or check the version displayed in the server management console.Affected if The installed version is less than 24.8.13981.13 or is in the range 24.8.13981.13 to 24.10.x (versions below 24.11)
-
Verify LDAP authentication module is in useIn the M-Files Server administration interface, navigate to the authentication settings or user management section to determine if LDAP/Active Directory authentication is enabled and configured.Affected if LDAP authentication is enabled and the server connects to an OpenLDAP directory
-
Inspect LDAP connection configurationReview the LDAP authentication settings in M-Files Server to identify the connected LDAP server type and its connection parameters. Check whether the connection is to an OpenLDAP server.Affected if The M-Files Server is configured to authenticate against an OpenLDAP server
-
Audit OpenLDAP server password policyConsult with your LDAP administrator or review the OpenLDAP server configuration (slapd.conf or cn=config settings) to determine whether the server permits simple bind operations without a password.Affected if The OpenLDAP server allows authentication binds without requiring a password, which M-Files improperly accepts
A user is affected if their M-Files Server version is below 24.11, LDAP authentication is enabled, and the connected OpenLDAP server permits passwordless authentication binds.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped24.8.13981.1324.11
Upgrade M-Files server to version 24.11 or later, and audit/remediate the OpenLDAP server configuration to ensure password-based authentication is required and enforced.
M-Files Server 24.11 or later (24.8.13981.13+)
- 1. Back up your current M-Files Server configuration and database before proceeding
- 2. Stop the M-Files Server service
- 3. Download M-Files Server version 24.11 or later (or version 24.8.13981.13 or later) from the official M-Files website or your customer portal
- 4. Install the upgraded M-Files Server version on your server
- 5. Start the M-Files Server service
- 6. Verify LDAP authentication is functioning correctly with the new version
- 7. Test that users can authenticate with their proper passwords (not without a password)
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,304.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2024-10127 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2024-10127 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data