CVE-2025-0635
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedDenial of service condition in M-Files Server in versions before 25.1.14445.5 allows an unauthenticated user to consume computing resources in certain conditions.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceM-Files Server versions prior to 25.1.14445.5 contain a denial of service vulnerability where an unauthenticated remote attacker can cause excessive resource consumption, likely through malformed or repeated requests that trigger computationally expensive operations.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 25.1.14445.5CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify M-Files Server installationCheck the M-Files Server version by logging into M-Files Admin, selecting the server vault, and viewing the version information in the server properties. Alternatively, check the 'About' dialog in the M-Files desktop client or use the M-Files Server Information tool if available.Affected if The installed version is lower than 25.1.14445.5
-
Verify version from server directlyAccess the M-Files Server administration interface or check the installation directory for version metadata. On Windows, the version can often be retrieved via file properties of the M-Files Server executable.Affected if The version displayed is < 25.1.14445.5
-
Confirm network exposureDetermine if the M-Files Server is accessible from untrusted networks. Check firewall rules, VPN configurations, and whether the server is exposed to the internet or untrusted internal segments.Affected if The server is network-accessible from unauthenticated clients or untrusted networks and the version is below 25.1.14445.5
-
Review server logs for resource anomaliesExamine M-Files Server logs for signs of excessive resource consumption, repeated failed requests, or unusual request patterns that may indicate exploitation attempts.Affected if Logs show sustained high CPU, memory usage, or repeated malformed requests and the version is below 25.1.14445.5
A user is affected if their M-Files Server version is below 25.1.14445.5 and the server is accessible to unauthenticated remote attackers.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped25.1.14445.5
Upgrade M-Files Server to version 25.1.14445.5 or later to remediate this vulnerability. Consider implementing rate limiting or network-level controls as additional defense-in-depth while planning the upgrade.
25.1.14445.5
- Check current M-Files Server version through M-Files Admin or Vault Administration interface
- Download M-Files Server version 25.1.14445.5 or later from the official M-Files customer portal
- Schedule a maintenance window as the upgrade will require service interruption
- Back up the M-Files database and all configurations before upgrading
- Run the M-Files Server installer and follow the upgrade wizard to complete the update
- After upgrading, verify the M-Files Server service is running correctly
- Test critical M-Files workflows to confirm normal operation
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,544.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-0635 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-0635 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data