CVE-2022-20624
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability in the Cisco Fabric Services over IP (CFSoIP) feature of Cisco NX-OS Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to cause a denial of service (DoS) condition on an affected device. This vulnerability is due to insufficient validation of incoming CFSoIP packets. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending crafted CFSoIP packets to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to cause the affected device to reload, resulting in a DoS condition.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA vulnerability in Cisco Fabric Services over IP (CFSoIP) feature of Cisco NX-OS Software allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to send crafted CFSoIP packets to an affected device. Due to insufficient validation of incoming packets, the attacker can trigger a device reload, causing denial of service.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 7.0\(3\)= 9.2\(2\)= 9.2\(3\)= 9.3\(3\)= 9.3\(5\)= 4.1\(1a\)aCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify NX-OS versionRun 'show version' on the device CLI or retrieve the version via SNMP/management interfaceAffected if The displayed version matches any of these exact versions: 7.0(3), 9.2(2), 9.2(3), 9.3(3), 9.3(5), or 4.1(1a)a
-
Confirm CFSoIP feature is enabledRun 'show feature | include fabric' or 'show running-config | include feature fabric' to check if Cisco Fabric Services over IP feature is turned onAffected if CFSoIP or fabric services feature shows as 'enabled' in the output
-
Check CFSoIP port exposureRun 'show tcp brief | include 8787' or check ACLs and interface configurations for port 8787 (default CFSoIP port) to see if it is accessible from untrusted networksAffected if Port 8787 (or configured CFSoIP port) is open to untrusted/internet-facing networks
-
Verify CFSoIP configurationRun 'show running-config | include cfsoip' or 'show cfsoip' to examine CFSoIP-specific settings and source validationAffected if CFSoIP is configured and incoming packet validation appears weak or disabled
You are affected if your device runs NX-OS version 7.0(3), 9.2(2), 9.2(3), 9.3(3), 9.3(5), or 4.1(1a)a AND has the CFSoIP feature enabled with port 8787 exposed to untrusted networks.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply the Cisco NX-OS software update that addresses this vulnerability. If unable to immediately patch, consider restricting network access to CFSoIP ports from untrusted sources using ACLs or firewall rules until the patch can be deployed.
Cisco NX-OS fixed release as specified in the Cisco Security Advisory for CVE-2022-20624 (consult tools.cisco.com for exact version)
- 1. Identify the current Cisco NX-OS version running on the affected device using 'show version'
- 2. Access Cisco.com and navigate to the Security Advisory for CVE-2022-20624
- 3. Download the recommended fixed NX-OS version for your specific platform from the Cisco advisory
- 4. Upload the new NX-OS image to the device's bootflash
- 5. Configure the device to boot from the new image using 'install all' command
- 6. Verify the device reloads with the patched version
- 7. Confirm CFSoIP functionality is restored using 'show cfs status'
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,488.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-20624 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-20624 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data