CVE-2022-20629
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMultiple vulnerabilities in the web-based management interface of Cisco Firepower Management Center (FMC) Software could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to conduct a cross-site scripting (XSS) attack against a user of the interface. These vulnerabilities are due to insufficient validation of user-supplied input by the web-based management interface. An attacker could exploit these vulnerabilities by persuading a user of the interface to click a crafted link. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary script code in the context of the interface or access sensitive, browser-based information.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThis is a cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Firepower Management Center (FMC) Software. The vulnerability stems from insufficient validation of user-supplied input, allowing an authenticated remote attacker to inject malicious script code via crafted links. Successful exploitation enables arbitrary script execution in the context of the interface or access to sensitive browser-based information.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 6.4.0.15>= 6.5.0, < 6.6.5.2>= 6.7.0, < 7.0.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the installed FMC productAccess the web management interface and look for the product name in the login page or admin dashboard, or run 'show version' via CLI on the deviceAffected if Product is not Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center (or Cisco Firepower Management Center)
-
Determine the FMC software versionIn the web interface, go to System > About > Cisco Firepower Management Center (or Help > About). Via CLI, run 'show version' and look for the release numberAffected if Version cannot be determined or is not visible in the expected location
-
Compare installed version against affected rangesCheck if the installed version falls into any of these ranges: < 6.4.0.15, >= 6.5.0 but < 6.6.5.2, or >= 6.7.0 but < 7.0.2Affected if Installed version matches any of the affected version ranges
-
Verify web-based management interface accessibilityConfirm that the FMC web interface is accessible on the network (check for open HTTP/HTTPS ports 443/8000 or similar on the management IP)Affected if Web interface is exposed and version is in the affected ranges
Your environment is affected if Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center is running and its installed version falls within < 6.4.0.15, >= 6.5.0 to < 6.6.5.2, or >= 6.7.0 to < 7.0.2 with the web management interface enabled.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped6.4.0.156.6.5.27.0.2
Apply the Cisco security patch when available; until then, user awareness training to avoid clicking untrusted links and implementation of Content Security Policy (CSP) headers can help mitigate the risk of XSS exploitation.
Minimum fixed releases: 6.4.0.15 (or upgrade to 6.5.0+), 6.6.5.2 (or upgrade to 6.7.0+), or 7.0.2 (or later 7.x)
- For systems on 6.4.x branch: Upgrade to version 6.4.0.15 or later (6.4.0.15, 6.5.0, 6.6.x, or 7.0.x)
- For systems on 6.5.0-6.6.5.x branch: Upgrade to version 6.6.5.2 or later (6.6.5.2, 6.7.0, or 7.0.x)
- For systems on 6.7.0-7.0.2 branch: Upgrade to version 7.0.2 or later (7.0.2 or later 7.x release)
- After upgrade, verify the FMC version matches the fixed release via System > Updates > Product Updates in the web interface
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,408.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-20629 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-20629 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data