CVE-2022-25169
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe BPG parser in versions of Apache Tika before 1.28.2 and 2.4.0 may allocate an unreasonable amount of memory on carefully crafted files.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceApache Tika's BPG (Better Portable Graphics) parser versions before 1.28.2 and 2.4.0 is vulnerable to resource exhaustion. Specially crafted BPG image files can cause the parser to allocate an unreasonable amount of memory, leading to denial of service conditions.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 1.28.2>= 2.0.0, < 2.4.0>= 17.7, <= 17.12= 18.8= 19.12= 20.12= 21.12CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Apache Tika versionLocate the tika-core or tika-server JAR file and check its version from the filename, MANIFEST.MF, or run: java -jar tika-core-{version}.jar --versionAffected if The installed version is less than 1.28.2, OR greater than or equal to 2.0.0 but less than 2.4.0
-
Verify BPG parser is availableConfirm the BPG parser module (tika-parser-bpg) is present in the classpath or lib directory, or check if BPG content type detection is activeAffected if The BPG parser is loaded and able to process BPG files in the environment
-
Check Oracle Primavera Unifier version (if applicable)If Oracle Primavera Unifier is in use, identify its version through the Oracle Enterprise Manager, WebLogic admin console, or product documentationAffected if The installed version matches: 17.7 through 17.12, 18.8, 19.12, 20.12, or 21.12, AND the application processes BPG image uploads
A user is affected if their Apache Tika version falls within the vulnerable ranges AND the BPG parser is enabled, or if they run a vulnerable Oracle Primavera Unifier version that processes BPG images.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped1.28.22.4.0
Upgrade Apache Tika to version 1.28.2, 2.4.0, or later. If immediate patching is not feasible, consider disabling the BPG parser or implementing memory allocation limits at the application level.
Apache Tika 1.28.2 or 2.4.0 (depending on major version); Oracle Primavera Unifier patches via Oracle Critical Patch Updates
- For Apache Tika: Upgrade to version 1.28.2 if using the 1.x line, or upgrade to version 2.4.0 if using the 2.x line
- For Primavera Unifier: Apply the relevant Oracle Critical Patch Update that addresses this vulnerability for your specific version (17.7-17.12, 18.8, 19.12, or 20.12)
- After upgrading, verify the BPG parser handles large files within reasonable memory constraints
- Consider implementing memory limits for parser operations as an additional defense-in-depth measure
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,408.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-25169 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-25169 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data