CVE-2022-38378
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn improper privilege management vulnerability [CWE-269] in Fortinet FortiOS version 7.2.0 and before 7.0.7 and FortiProxy version 7.2.0 through 7.2.1 and before 7.0.7 allows an attacker that has access to the admin profile section (System subsection Administrator Users) to modify their own profile and upgrade their privileges to Read Write via CLI or GUI commands.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceIn FortiOS and FortiProxy, an attacker with access to the admin profile section (System > Administrator Users) can modify their own profile to escalate privileges to Read Write level. This improper privilege management allows a limited admin user to gain full administrative control via CLI or GUI commands.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 1.1.0, <= 2.0.9>= 7.0.0, < 7.0.8>= 7.2.0, < 7.2.2>= 6.0.0, < 7.0.8>= 7.2.0, < 7.2.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check FortiOS versionRun the command: get system status | grep Version (via CLI) or go to Dashboard > Status in GUIAffected if The version falls within 6.0.0 to 7.0.7, 7.2.0 to 7.2.0 (FortiOS); or the version falls within 1.1.0 to 2.0.9, 7.0.0 to 7.0.7, 7.2.0 to 7.2.1 (FortiProxy)
-
Identify admin users with access to Administrator Users sectionRun: show system admin (CLI) or navigate to System > Administrator Users in GUI to list accountsAffected if Any limited admin account has access to modify admin profiles in System > Administrator Users
-
Review admin profile privilegesRun: get system admin (CLI) or inspect each admin user profile in GUI under System > Administrator Users to check the Access Profile or Admin Profile settingAffected if A non-super_admin account has been granted Read Write privileges or a profile with elevated permissions beyond what was intended
-
Audit recent admin profile modificationsRun: execute log filter category event and execute log display (CLI) to review logs for changes to admin profile settingsAffected if Logs show modifications to admin profiles that were not initiated by the super_admin
You are affected if your FortiOS version is 6.0.0 to <7.0.8 or 7.2.0 to <7.2.1, or FortiProxy version is 1.1.0 to 2.0.9, 7.0.0 to <7.0.8, or 7.2.0 to <7.2.2, AND any limited admin user has access to modify admin profiles in the System > Administrator Users section.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped7.0.87.2.17.2.2
Upgrade FortiOS to version 7.0.7, 7.2.2 or later; upgrade FortiProxy to 7.0.7 or later. Apply least-privilege principles to admin accounts and restrict access to the Administrator Users section.
FortiOS: 7.0.8+ or 7.2.1+ | FortiProxy: 7.0.8+ or 7.2.2+
- 1. Identify the current FortiOS or FortiProxy version running on your device using the CLI command: get system status
- 2. For FortiOS devices: Upgrade to version 7.0.8 or later, or version 7.2.1 or later
- 3. For FortiProxy devices: Upgrade to version 7.0.8 or later, or version 7.2.2 or later
- 4. Download the firmware from the Fortinet Customer Support portal (https://support.fortinet.com)
- 5. Upload and install the firmware via the FortiOS/FortiProxy GUI under System > Firmware, or via CLI using the execute firmware command
- 6. After upgrade, verify the installation and confirm the version using: get system status
- 7. Review administrator accounts in System > Administrator Users to ensure only authorized users have Read-Write access
- 8. Consider implementing the principle of least privilege for admin profiles
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,880.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-38378 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-38378 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data