CVE-2022-39042
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedaEnrich a+HRD has improper validation for login function. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this vulnerability to bypass authentication and access API function to perform arbitrary system command or disrupt service.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceaEnrich a+HRD contains an authentication bypass vulnerability in its login function due to improper validation. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this to bypass authentication and access API functions, allowing arbitrary system command execution or service disruption.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 6.8= 7.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm aEnrich a+HRD installationIdentify if aEnrich a+HRD software is deployed in your environment. Check installed applications, software inventory, or consult your IT asset management system for HRD or a+HRD packages.Affected if aEnrich a+HRD software is present in your environment
-
Determine installed versionLocate the installed version of a+HRD. Check the software itself via its about/help menu, or inspect system files, registry entries, or installation directories for version information.Affected if The installed version is exactly 6.8 or exactly 7.0
-
Verify login/API exposureDetermine if the a+HRD login/API functions are network-accessible. Check firewall rules, reverse proxy configurations, or network access control lists for ports or endpoints serving the HRD application.Affected if The login or API endpoints are accessible from untrusted networks without additional authentication layers
-
Check for unauthorized access indicatorsReview application logs, authentication logs, and audit trails for unusual login patterns, successful authentications from unexpected IP addresses, or API calls that bypassed normal authentication flow.Affected if Logs show successful authentications or API access without valid credentials, or from sources that should not have access
You are affected if aEnrich a+HRD versions 6.8 or 7.0 are installed and the login/API interface is network-accessible.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement proper input validation and robust authentication checks in the login function to ensure all authentication requests are properly validated before granting access.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,696.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-39042 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-39042 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data