CVE-2022-43947
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn improper restriction of excessive authentication attempts vulnerability [CWE-307] in Fortinet FortiOS version 7.2.0 through 7.2.3 and before 7.0.10, FortiProxy version 7.2.0 through 7.2.2 and before 7.0.8 administrative interface allows an attacker with a valid user account to perform brute-force attacks on other user accounts via injecting valid login sessions.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceFortiOS and FortiProxy fail to properly restrict excessive authentication attempts, allowing an authenticated attacker with a valid user account to perform brute-force attacks on other user accounts by injecting valid login sessions. This bypasses account lockout or rate-limiting protections.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 1.0.0, <= 2.0.9>= 7.0.0, < 7.0.8>= 7.2.0, < 7.2.2>= 6.2.0, < 6.4.13>= 7.0.0, < 7.0.11>= 7.2.0, < 7.2.4CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify product type and versionRun 'get system status' or 'get system info' via CLI to retrieve FortiOS or FortiProxy version and build numberAffected if Product is FortiOS version 6.2.0 to 6.4.12, 7.0.0 to 7.0.10, or 7.2.0 to 7.2.3; OR FortiProxy version 1.0.0 to 2.0.9, 7.0.0 to 7.0.7, or 7.2.0 to 7.2.2
-
Confirm admin or user authentication is enabledCheck system global settings or policy configuration for authentication services (GUI: System > Settings > Authentication or CLI: 'show system global' and 'show user authentication')Affected if Local user authentication, RADIUS, or LDAP authentication is configured and enabled for administrative or user access
-
Verify brute-force protection statusReview account lockout settings via 'show system accprofile' or 'show user local' and check if 'block-enable' or account-lockout thresholds are configuredAffected if Account lockout is not enforced or rate-limiting is disabled for login attempts
-
Review authentication logs for session injection indicatorsExamine logs via 'execute log filter' and 'execute log display' for duplicate session IDs, concurrent sessions from same source, or authentication anomaliesAffected if Logs show unusual session patterns, multiple authentication attempts bypassing lockout, or duplicate session tokens
Environment is affected if running an affected FortiOS or FortiProxy version with authentication enabled and without proper session injection controls or enforced account lockout policies.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped6.4.137.0.87.0.11
Upgrade to FortiOS 7.0.10/7.2.4+ or FortiProxy 7.0.8/7.2.3+ to patch the vulnerability, and review/adjust administrative account lockout policies and login attempt rate limiting.
FortiOS: 6.4.13+, 7.0.11+, or 7.2.4+ | FortiProxy: 7.0.8+ or 7.2.2+
- 1. Identify the currently installed FortiOS or FortiProxy version by running 'get system status' or 'get system version' in the CLI
- 2. Based on your current major version branch, upgrade to the fixed release: For FortiOS 6.x branch, upgrade to 6.4.13 or later; For FortiOS 7.0.x branch, upgrade to 7.0.11 or later; For FortiOS 7.2.x branch, upgrade to 7.2.4 or later; For FortiProxy 7.0.x branch, upgrade to 7.0.8 or later; For FortiProxy 7.2.x branch, upgrade to 7.2.2 or later
- 3. Download the firmware from Fortinet's support portal (support.fortinet.com) after authenticating
- 4. Upload and install the firmware via the FortiOS/FortiProxy CLI using 'execute firmware upgrade' or via the web GUI under System > Firmware
- 5. After upgrade, verify the new version is installed with 'get system status'
- 6. Test that administrative access and user authentication functionality works correctly
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,224.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-43947 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-43947 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data