CVE-2022-43955
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn improper neutralization of input during web page generation [CWE-79] in the FortiWeb web interface 7.0.0 through 7.0.3, 6.3.0 through 6.3.21, 6.4 all versions, 6.2 all versions, 6.1 all versions and 6.0 all versions may allow an unauthenticated and remote attacker to perform a reflected cross site scripting attack (XSS) via injecting malicious payload in log entries used to build report.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in FortiWeb web interface allows unauthenticated remote attackers to inject malicious JavaScript payloads into log entries. These entries are later rendered in reports without proper sanitization, enabling the attacker's script to execute in the context of legitimate users viewing those reports.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 6.0.0, <= 6.2.7>= 6.3.0, < 6.3.22>= 6.4.0, <= 6.4.2>= 7.0.0, < 7.0.4CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify FortiWeb versionLog into the FortiWeb CLI and run the command 'get system status' or check the web interface login page footer for the firmware version numberAffected if The installed version falls within any of these ranges: 6.0.0 through 6.2.7, 6.3.0 through 6.3.21, 6.4.0 through 6.4.2, or 7.0.0 through 7.0.3
-
Verify web interface is enabledIn the FortiWeb CLI, run 'show system interface' or check the web UI service status to confirm the administrative web interface is accessibleAffected if The web interface is exposed and reachable on HTTP/HTTPS ports
-
Confirm logging is enabledIn the web UI, navigate to Logd > Log Config > Log Settings, or run 'show log_fortiweb' in CLI to verify event logging is turned onAffected if Logging is enabled, which is typically the default configuration and necessary for the malicious log entries to be stored
-
Check report accessNavigate to Logd > Reports in the web UI or run 'show log_fortiweb-report' to see if report generation is configured and accessible to usersAffected if Report viewing functionality is available to users who would open log entries in reports
You are affected if your FortiWeb version is within the vulnerable ranges listed AND the web interface with logging and reporting features is enabled and accessible.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped6.3.227.0.4
Upgrade FortiWeb to a patched version beyond 7.0.3, 6.3.21, or the latest available version that addresses this vulnerability. Until patched, limit access to reporting features and monitor for suspicious log entries.
FortiWeb 7.0.4 (for 7.0.x branch); FortiWeb 6.3.22 (for 6.3.x branch); or appropriate patched version for other branches
- Identify the currently installed FortiWeb version using the web UI or CLI command: 'get system status'
- Upgrade to the appropriate fixed version based on your current branch: For 7.0.x branch, upgrade to version 7.0.4 or later; For 6.3.x branch, upgrade to version 6.3.22 or later; For 6.4.x branch, upgrade to a version higher than 6.4.2; For 6.2.x branch, upgrade to a version higher than 6.2.7; For 6.0.x and 6.1.x branches, upgrade to a version that includes the fix
- Download the firmware from Fortinet's support portal: https://support.fortinet.com/
- Upload and install the new firmware via FortiWeb web interface (System > Maintenance > Firmware) or CLI
- After upgrade, verify the new version is installed: 'get system status'
- Review and clear any potentially malicious log entries that may have been injected before the fix
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-43955 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-43955 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data