CVE-2022-48597
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA SQL injection vulnerability exists in the “ticket event report” feature of the ScienceLogic SL1 that takes unsanitized user‐controlled input and passes it directly to a SQL query. This allows for the injection of arbitrary SQL before being executed against the database.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceSQL injection vulnerability in ScienceLogic SL1's 'ticket event report' feature where user-controlled input is directly concatenated into SQL queries without sanitization or parameterization, allowing attackers to inject and execute arbitrary SQL commands.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 11.1.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed ScienceLogic SL1 versionAccess the ScienceLogic admin interface or check system information panel to find the current SL1 version numberAffected if The installed version is 11.1.2 or any lower version (11.x.y where y < 2, or any 10.x version)
-
Verify ticket event report feature accessNavigate to the ticket event report feature in the SL1 web interface or check feature availability through the admin dashboardAffected if The ticket event report feature is accessible and enabled in the system
-
Locate ticket event report handlerInspect the web application files on the SL1 server, looking for scripts or modules that handle the ticket event report functionalityAffected if A handler file exists that processes ticket event report requests and contains SQL query logic
-
Check for direct SQL concatenation in report codeExamine the ticket event report handler code for SQL query construction patterns, specifically looking for string concatenation or lack of parameterized queries with user inputAffected if User-supplied parameters from the ticket event report are directly concatenated into SQL strings without sanitization or binding
-
Review database user privilegesCheck the database user account used by the SL1 application for the ticket event report featureAffected if The application database user has elevated privileges (such as DDL or administrative rights) beyond what is required for read operations
A system is affected if it runs ScienceLogic SL1 version 11.1.2 or lower AND has the ticket event report feature enabled, with the vulnerable code pattern of direct SQL string concatenation present.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataFix by replacing direct SQL string concatenation with parameterized queries (prepared statements) and implementing proper input validation on all user-supplied data before database operations.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,408.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2022-48597 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2022-48597 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data