CVE-2023-23784
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA relative path traversal in Fortinet FortiWeb version 7.0.0 through 7.0.2, FortiWeb version 6.3.6 through 6.3.20, FortiWeb 6.4 all versions allows attacker to information disclosure via specially crafted web requests.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceRelative path traversal vulnerability in FortiWeb allows attackers to access files outside the web root through specially crafted requests using relative path sequences (e.g., ../), resulting in information disclosure of sensitive system files.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 6.3.6, < 6.3.21>= 6.4.0, <= 6.4.2>= 7.0.0, < 7.0.3CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify FortiWeb installed versionLog into the FortiWeb CLI and run the command: `get system status` or access the web UI and check System > Status to view the firmware version.Affected if The version displayed matches one of the affected ranges: 6.3.6 through 6.3.20, 6.4.0 through 6.4.2, or 7.0.0 through 7.0.2.
-
Verify FortiWeb web service is enabledIn the FortiWeb web UI, go to System > Configuration > Administration > System Administration, or use CLI: `get system interface` to confirm the management or HTTP/HTTPS interfaces are configured and enabled.Affected if The web UI or API interface is accessible and processing requests, as the path traversal flaw exists in how FortiWeb handles web requests.
-
Check for exposure of web interfaceDetermine if the FortiWeb management interface or any protected web applications are reachable from network segments. Review interface bindings via `show system interface` in CLI.Affected if The web interface is externally accessible or reachable from untrusted networks, creating an attack vector for the path traversal.
-
Review web traffic logs for suspicious path patternsIn FortiWeb, go to Log & Report > Traffic Log or use CLI: `execute log filter category traffic` and search for requests containing '../' or encoded path traversal sequences.Affected if Log entries show attempted or successful use of relative path sequences (../) in URL parameters, indicating exploitation attempts.
You are affected if your FortiWeb version falls within 6.3.6-6.3.20, 6.4.0-6.4.2, or 7.0.0-7.0.2 and the web interface is accessible to handle incoming requests.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped6.3.217.0.3
Upgrade to patched FortiWeb version outside the affected ranges (7.0.0-7.0.2, 6.3.6-6.3.20, 6.4.x) or apply vendor-supplied patch; implement strict input validation on file path parameters.
Upgrade to FortiWeb 6.3.21, 6.4.3, or 7.0.3 (or later respective releases)
- 1. Identify current FortiWeb version using the Web UI (System > Status) or CLI: 'get system status'
- 2. Back up current FortiWeb configuration via Web UI (System > Maintenance > Backup & Restore) or CLI: 'execute backup full-config'
- 3. Download the appropriate firmware image from Fortinet Customer Support portal for your branch: 6.3.21 or later for 6.3.x, 6.4.3 or later for 6.4.x, or 7.0.3 or later for 7.0.x
- 4. In FortiWeb Web UI, navigate to System > Maintenance > Firmware
- 5. Select the new firmware file and initiate the upgrade
- 6. After reboot, verify the new version is installed: 'get system status'
- 7. Confirm the configuration was preserved and test critical functionality
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-23784 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-23784 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data