Node.jsApplication

CVE-2023-32006

HIGH · 8.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2023-08-15
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 20.5.0 or later.
See remediation →
94/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
The use of `module.constructor.createRequire()` can bypass the policy mechanism and require modules outside of the policy.json definition for a given module. This vulnerability affects all users using the experimental policy mechanism in all active release lines: 16.x, 18.x, and, 20.x. Please note that at the time this CVE was issued, the policy is an experimental feature of Node.js.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

The `module.constructor.createRequire()` function in Node.js can create a new require function that bypasses the experimental policy mechanism, allowing modules to be loaded outside the boundaries defined in policy.json. This defeats the purpose of the policy mechanism which is intended to restrict module loading to an approved set defined in policy.json.

MitigationUpgrade to a patched Node.js version (16.x, 18.x, or 20.x per your release line). If immediate patching is not possible, audit code for use of createRequire and consider disabling the experimental policy mechanism until a fix can be applied.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Node.jsApplication
Affected:>= 16.0.0, <= 16.20.1>= 18.0.0, <= 18.17.0>= 20.0.0, <= 20.5.0
FedoraOperating system
Affected:= 37= 38

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Check Node.js version
    Run `node --version` to get the installed Node.js version
    Affected if Version falls within 16.0.0-16.20.1, 18.0.0-18.17.0, or 20.0.0-20.5.0
  2. Verify policy mechanism is enabled
    Look for a policy.json file in the project root or check if Node.js was launched with --experimental-policy pointing to a policy file
    Affected if A policy.json file exists and is being enforced by Node.js
  3. Search for createRequire usage
    Search codebase for `module.constructor.createRequire` or `require('module').createRequire` patterns
    Affected if Code uses the createRequire function to load modules

You are affected if you run an affected Node.js version, have a policy.json file enforcing module restrictions, and your codebase uses module.constructor.createRequire() to bypass those restrictions.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 20.5.0
Interim mitigation

Upgrade to a patched Node.js version (16.x, 18.x, or 20.x per your release line). If immediate patching is not possible, audit code for use of createRequire and consider disabling the experimental policy mechanism until a fix can be applied.

Recommended fix High confidence

Node.js 16.20.2+ (16.x), 18.18.0+ (18.x), or 20.6.0+ (20.x)

  1. Identify the currently installed Node.js version using `node --version`
  2. For Node.js 16.x users: upgrade to version 16.20.2 or later (e.g., 16.20.2, 18.18.0, 20.6.0)
  3. For Node.js 18.x users: upgrade to version 18.18.0 or later
  4. For Node.js 20.x users: upgrade to version 20.6.0 or later
  5. Verify the upgrade was successful by running `node --version`
  6. If using policy mechanism, test that module.require() and createRequire() both correctly respect policy.json
Caveat Minimal - this is a security fix; policy remains experimental

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Node.js Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
12.0 hours of engineering $2,130
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,408.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-32006 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-32006 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data