CVE-2023-32757
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditede-Excellence U-Office Force file uploading function does not restrict upload of file with dangerous type. An unauthenticated remote attacker without logging the service can exploit this vulnerability to upload arbitrary files to perform arbitrary command or disrupt service.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe U-Office Force application contains an unrestricted file upload vulnerability in its file uploading function. An unauthenticated remote attacker can upload files with dangerous types (such as executable scripts or web shells) without any authentication, allowing arbitrary command execution or service disruption.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 20.0.7668dCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify U-Office Force installationSearch the system for U-Office Force or UOF application directories, or check web server configuration for U-Office Force virtual directories/ApplicationsAffected if The application is present on the system
-
Verify installed versionLocate version information in the application installation directory, configuration files, or the application itself, then compare to the affected version 20.0.7668dAffected if The installed version matches 20.0.7668d exactly
-
Locate file upload functionalityIdentify the file upload module or endpoint in the web application by reviewing application structure, looking for upload forms, or examining web server logs for upload-related requestsAffected if The file upload feature is present and accessible
-
Check upload directory configurationExamine the web server configuration and file system permissions for the upload directory to determine if script execution is permittedAffected if Upload directories allow execution of uploaded files (e.g., .php, .asp, .jsp, .exe) or are stored within the web root without restrictions
-
Review existing uploaded filesInspect the upload directory for files with dangerous extensions (.php, .asp, .jsp, .js, .exe, .sh, .bat) or unexpected file types that could indicate compromiseAffected if Unexpected script files or executables exist in the upload directory
A system is affected if it runs Edetw U Office Force version 20.0.7668d and exposes the file upload functionality without strict validation, allowing attackers to upload and execute malicious scripts.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement strict allowlist-based file type validation on the server side, restrict uploaded file extensions to safe types only (e.g., images, documents), store uploads outside the web root or with no execute permissions, and disable script execution in the upload directory.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-32757 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-32757 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data