U Office ForceApplication · Edetw

CVE-2025-12865

HIGH · 8.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-11-10
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 29.50 or later.
See remediation →
94/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
U-Office Force developed by e-Excellence has a SQL Injection vulnerability, allowing authenticated remote attacker to inject arbitrary SQL commands to read, modify, and delete database contents.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

U-Office Force by e-Excellence contains a SQL Injection vulnerability exploitable by authenticated remote attackers, allowing injection of arbitrary SQL commands with the ability to read, modify, and delete database contents.

MitigationImplement parameterized queries or prepared statements for all database interactions, apply strict input validation, and ensure database accounts operate with least-privilege access.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
U Office ForceApplication
Affected:< 29.50

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify installed U-Office Force version
    Locate the application version information in the product documentation, about page, or system administration panel. This is typically found in Help > About or in the installation directory's version file.
    Affected if The installed version is Edetw U Office Force with a version number lower than 29.50
  2. Confirm authentication is enabled
    Verify that user authentication is configured and enabled for the U-Office Force web interface or API. Check the authentication settings in the administration console.
    Affected if Remote authentication is enabled, allowing external users to log in to the application
  3. Identify web-facing database input points
    Review the web application for any forms, search fields, API parameters, or URL parameters that accept user input and interact with the database. These are potential SQL injection entry points.
    Affected if User-controllable input fields that interface with database queries are exposed via the web interface
  4. Check for unauthenticated access paths
    Examine whether there are any endpoints or functionalities accessible without authentication that might contain the vulnerable SQL injection code path.
    Affected if Any part of the application accepts authenticated user input and passes it to database queries without proper parameterization

Your environment is affected if you are running Edetw U Office Force version below 29.50 with authentication enabled and web-accessible input fields that interact with the database.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 29.50 or later
Fixed in 29.50
Interim mitigation

Implement parameterized queries or prepared statements for all database interactions, apply strict input validation, and ensure database accounts operate with least-privilege access.

Recommended fix Moderate confidence

U Office Force version 29.50 or later

  1. Download U Office Force version 29.50 or later from the official vendor (e-Excellence)
  2. Apply the upgrade following the vendor's standard upgrade procedure
  3. Verify the upgrade was successful by checking the software version
  4. Test that the SQL injection vulnerability is no longer present

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in U Office Force Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation6.0 h
  • Implementation12.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
28.0 hours of engineering $4,980
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,968.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-12865 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-12865 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data