CVE-2023-41186
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedD-Link DAP-1325 CGI Missing Authentication Information Disclosure Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows network-adjacent attackers to access various functionality on affected installations of D-Link DAP-1325 routers. Authentication is not required to exploit this vulnerability. The specific flaw exists within the implementation of the CGI interface. The issue results from the lack of authentication prior to allowing access to functionality. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to disclose stored credentials, leading to further compromise. Was ZDI-CAN-18804.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThis is a missing authentication vulnerability in the CGI interface of D-Link DAP-1325 routers. Network-adjacent attackers can access the CGI interface without any credentials, allowing them to retrieve stored credentials (including administrative passwords) from the device configuration. The lack of authentication checks before sensitive functionality enables direct credential disclosure leading to full device compromise.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 1.09b03CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Adjacent
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the device modelAccess the router's web management interface or check the device label to confirm it is a D-Link DAP-1325 modelAffected if Device is not a D-Link DAP-1325
-
Check the installed firmware versionLog into the router web interface and navigate to the Status or Management page to view the firmware version, or use the router's web API endpoint that exposes version informationAffected if Firmware version is less than 1.09b03
-
Verify CGI interface accessibilityAttempt to access the router's CGI scripts directly over the network using a web browser or curl command (for example, accessing common CGI endpoints like /cgi-bin/ or similar endpoints that return device configuration) without providing any authentication credentialsAffected if CGI interface returns configuration data or accepts commands without requiring any login credentials
-
Check for credential exposure in responsesInspect any responses from the CGI interface for sensitive data such as stored usernames, passwords, or configuration parameters that should require authenticationAffected if The CGI response contains plaintext credentials or sensitive configuration data without prior authentication
A user is affected if they have a D-Link DAP-1325 router running firmware version prior to 1.09b03 and the router's CGI interface is accessible on the network without requiring authentication credentials.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped1.09b03
Apply vendor firmware updates when available. Until patched, restrict network access to the router's management interface using firewall rules or network segmentation to prevent untrusted devices from reaching the CGI endpoints.
D-Link DAP-1325 Firmware version 1.09b03 or later
- 1. Identify the current firmware version of the D-Link DAP-1325 device by accessing the router's web management interface.
- 2. Navigate to the firmware upgrade or administration section in the web UI.
- 3. Download the firmware version 1.09b03 or later from the official D-Link support website (support.dlink.com).
- 4. Upload the new firmware file through the web management interface and allow the device to complete the update process.
- 5. After the router restarts, verify the firmware has been updated to version 1.09b03 or newer.
- 6. Confirm the vulnerability is addressed by attempting to access CGI endpoints without authentication (or use vulnerability scanning tools if available).
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-41186 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-41186 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data