CVE-2023-44253
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn exposure of sensitive information to an unauthorized actor vulnerability [CWE-200] in Fortinet FortiManager version 7.4.0 through 7.4.1 and before 7.2.5, FortiAnalyzer version 7.4.0 through 7.4.1 and before 7.2.5 and FortiAnalyzer-BigData before 7.2.5 allows an adom administrator to enumerate other adoms and device names via crafted HTTP or HTTPS requests.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThis is an information disclosure vulnerability in FortiManager and FortiAnalyzer where an authenticated adom administrator (a lower-privileged administrative domain user) can enumerate other ADOMs and device names by sending crafted HTTP/HTTPS requests. The vulnerability exposes sensitive infrastructure topology information (ADOM names and managed device identities) to unauthorized parties within the same system.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 6.2.0, <= 6.2.12>= 6.4.0, <= 6.4.14>= 7.0.0, <= 7.0.11>= 7.2.0, <= 7.2.3= 7.4.0= 7.4.1>= 6.2.0, <= 6.2.12>= 6.4.0, <= 6.4.14>= 7.0.0, <= 7.0.11>= 7.2.0, <= 7.2.3= 7.4.0= 7.4.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify product and versionAccess the FortiManager or FortiAnalyzer web UI, go to System > Settings > About, or run 'get system status' via CLI to retrieve the exact version numberAffected if The installed version falls within any of these ranges: 6.2.0 to 6.2.12, 6.4.0 to 6.4.14, 7.0.0 to 7.0.11, 7.2.0 to 7.2.3, 7.4.0, or 7.4.1
-
Confirm ADOM feature is enabledIn the web UI, navigate to Global > System > Settings, or run 'get system admin setting' via CLI and check if 'adom mode' is set to something other than 'normal'Affected if ADOM mode is enabled (specific or normal) and the version is in the affected list
-
Check for adom administrator accountsIn the web UI, go to Local Users & Groups > Administrators, or run 'get system admin' via CLI, and identify accounts with 'adom admin' profile typeAffected if Any adom administrator accounts exist in the system
-
Review access logs for anomalous API patternsIn the web UI, go to Log & Report > Event Log > System Events, filter for admin login and API activity, looking for repeated GET requests to '/api/v2/monitor/' endpoints from lower-privileged usersAffected if Multiple API requests targeting other ADOMs or device information are observed from adom administrator sessions
A user is affected if they run a vulnerable FortiManager or FortiAnalyzer version within the affected ranges and have adom administrator accounts configured on the system.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade FortiManager and FortiAnalyzer to version 7.2.5 or later, or version 7.4.2 or later. Restrict adom administrator privileges where possible and monitor for anomalous API/HTTP request patterns.
FortiManager/FortiAnalyzer 7.2.5 or later, or 7.4.2 or later; FortiAnalyzer-BigData 7.2.5 or later
- 1. Identify the FortiManager and FortiAnalyzer versions currently deployed in your environment
- 2. For FortiManager: upgrade to version 7.2.5 or later, or 7.4.2 or later
- 3. For FortiAnalyzer: upgrade to version 7.2.5 or later, or 7.4.2 or later
- 4. For FortiAnalyzer-BigData: upgrade to version 7.2.5 or later
- 5. After upgrade, verify the adom administrator role permissions are correctly configured and test that enumeration is no longer possible
- 6. Review audit logs to confirm no unauthorized enumeration occurred prior to patching
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,600.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-44253 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-44253 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data