CVE-2023-45615
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThere are buffer overflow vulnerabilities in the underlying CLI service that could lead to unauthenticated remote code execution by sending specially crafted packets destined to the PAPI (Aruba's access point management protocol) UDP port (8211). Successful exploitation of these vulnerabilities result in the ability to execute arbitrary code as a privileged user on the underlying operating system.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceBuffer overflow vulnerabilities in Aruba's CLI service for the PAPI (access point management) protocol on UDP port 8211 allow unauthenticated remote attackers to execute arbitrary code as privileged users by sending specially crafted packets.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 10.3.0.0, < 10.4.0.3= 10.5.0.0>= 6.4.0.0, < 8.6.0.23>= 8.10.0.0, < 8.10.0.9>= 8.11.0.0, < 8.11.2.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify product and versionRun 'show version' on the Aruba device CLI or check system information in the web interface to determine if the device runs ArubaOS or HP InstantOS and note the exact firmware versionAffected if The installed version falls within any of these ranges: ArubaOS >= 10.3.0.0 and < 10.4.0.3, or = 10.5.0.0; HP InstantOS >= 6.4.0.0 and < 8.6.0.23, or >= 8.10.0.0 and < 8.10.0.9, or >= 8.11.0.0 and < 8.11.2.0
-
Verify PAPI service is accessibleCheck if UDP port 8211 is open and listening on the device using 'show ip interface' or by scanning the device from an external host with 'nmap -sU -p 8211 <device_ip>'Affected if UDP port 8211 is open and reachable (the PAPI protocol service is exposed)
-
Confirm PAPI protocol is enabledRun 'show papi status' or 'show controller' in the CLI to verify the PAPI service is enabled and operationalAffected if The PAPI service shows as enabled or running in the command output
-
Check network exposure of management interfaceReview the device network configuration to determine if the management interface (or interface bound to UDP 8211) is accessible from untrusted networks, using 'show management' or reviewing ACL configurationsAffected if The management interface with PAPI is exposed to untrusted network segments or the internet
You are affected if the device runs a vulnerable ArubaOS or HP InstantOS version AND UDP port 8211 (PAPI service) is accessible from a network where untrusted actors can reach it.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped8.6.0.238.10.0.98.11.2.0
Apply available vendor patches or firmware updates from Aruba for affected products; as a compensating control, restrict or block untrusted access to UDP port 8211.
ArubaOS: 10.4.0.3+ (for 10.3.x) / 10.5.1.0+ (for 10.5.0.0); InstantOS: 8.6.0.23+, 8.10.0.9+, 8.11.2.0+
- Identify the current ArubaOS or InstantOS version running on the affected device using 'show version' command
- For ArubaOS 10.3.x deployments: Upgrade to ArubaOS 10.4.0.3 or later (or the latest 10.4.x stable release)
- For ArubaOS 10.5.0.0 deployments: Upgrade to the next available 10.5.x stable release that includes the security fix
- For InstantOS 6.4.x deployments: Upgrade to InstantOS 8.6.0.23 or later
- For InstantOS 8.10.x deployments: Upgrade to InstantOS 8.10.0.9 or later
- For InstantOS 8.11.x deployments: Upgrade to InstantOS 8.11.2.0 or later
- After upgrade, verify the device is running a non-vulnerable version using 'show version'
- If remote access is not required for PAPI (UDP port 8211), consider blocking UDP port 8211 at the network perimeter as an additional mitigation
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,728.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-45615 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-45615 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data