CVE-2023-47536
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn improper access control vulnerability [CWE-284] in FortiOS version 7.2.0, version 7.0.13 and below, version 6.4.14 and below and FortiProxy version 7.2.3 and below, version 7.0.9 and below, version 2.0.12 and below may allow a remote unauthenticated attacker to bypass the firewall deny geolocalisation policy via timing the bypass with a GeoIP database update.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA timing-based access control bypass in FortiOS and FortiProxy allows unauthenticated remote attackers to circumvent firewall deny geolocation policies by exploiting the window when the GeoIP database is being updated, potentially permitting traffic from blocked regions to pass through.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 2.0.0, <= 2.0.12>= 7.0.0, <= 7.0.9>= 7.2.0, <= 7.2.3>= 6.4.0, <= 6.4.14>= 7.0.0, <= 7.0.13= 7.2.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Determine installed FortiOS versionRun CLI command 'get system status' or check System Information widget in web UI to view the firmware versionAffected if Version falls within >= 6.4.0 to <= 6.4.14, >= 7.0.0 to <= 7.0.13, or equals 7.2.0
-
Determine installed FortiProxy versionRun CLI command 'get system status' or check System Information widget in web UI to view the firmware versionAffected if Version falls within >= 2.0.0 to <= 2.0.12, >= 7.0.0 to <= 7.0.9, or >= 7.2.0 to <= 7.2.3
-
Check if geolocation firewall policies existIn FortiOS/FortiProxy web UI, navigate to Policy & Objects > Firewall Policy and review policies with Destination or Source configured using GeoIP-based address objects, or run 'show firewall policy' in CLI to list all policiesAffected if Any firewall policy explicitly uses geolocation-based address objects to permit or deny traffic based on country or region
-
Verify GeoIP database configuration and update scheduleIn web UI, go to System > FortiGuard > GeoIP and Anti-Spam, or run CLI command 'get system fortiguard' to view GeoIP database settings and last update timeAffected if GeoIP database is configured with automatic updates and policies reference geolocation-based blocking
A system is affected if it runs a vulnerable FortiOS or FortiProxy version AND has firewall policies that rely on geolocation blocking, because the timing window during GeoIP database updates could allow traffic from blocked regions to pass through.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply the vendor-supplied patches for FortiOS and FortiProxy to address the GeoIP database update timing vulnerability, and verify that geolocation-based firewall policies correctly block traffic from restricted regions after the update.
FortiOS: 6.4.15+, 7.0.14+, 7.2.1+ | FortiProxy: 2.0.13+, 7.0.10+, 7.2.4+
- 1. Identify the currently running FortiOS or FortiProxy version using 'get system status' or 'fnsysctl get system status'
- 2. For FortiOS 6.4.x: Schedule upgrade to version 6.4.15 or later
- 3. For FortiOS 7.0.x: Schedule upgrade to version 7.0.14 or later
- 4. For FortiOS 7.2.x: Schedule upgrade to version 7.2.1 or later
- 5. For FortiProxy 2.0.x: Schedule upgrade to version 2.0.13 or later
- 6. For FortiProxy 7.0.x: Schedule upgrade to version 7.0.10 or later
- 7. For FortiProxy 7.2.x: Schedule upgrade to version 7.2.4 or later
- 8. Download the appropriate firmware from Fortinet support portal or FortiGuard
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,968.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-47536 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-47536 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data